Skip to Content
Main content

LAB SCHOOL OF FIN & TECH: X223 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

132
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

68

25%

LEVEL 2

76

28%

LEVEL 3

67

24%

LEVEL 4

65

24%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

50

17%

LEVEL 2

64

22%

LEVEL 3

89

31%

LEVEL 4

84

29%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

67
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

28

21%

LEVEL 2

37

28%

LEVEL 3

30

23%

LEVEL 4

37

28%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

107
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

21

13%

LEVEL 2

29

18%

LEVEL 3

53

34%

LEVEL 4

54

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

65
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

40

28%

LEVEL 2

39

27%

LEVEL 3

37

26%

LEVEL 4

28

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

66
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

29

22%

LEVEL 2

35

27%

LEVEL 3

36

28%

LEVEL 4

30

23%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

25
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

15

33%

LEVEL 2

6

13%

LEVEL 3

12

26%

LEVEL 4

13

28%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

24
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

8

20%

LEVEL 2

9

22%

LEVEL 3

14

34%

LEVEL 4

10

24%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

105
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

53

24%

LEVEL 2

66

29%

LEVEL 3

53

24%

LEVEL 4

52

23%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

142
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

42

18%

LEVEL 2

54

23%

LEVEL 3

72

30%

LEVEL 4

70

29%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

128
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

29

14%

LEVEL 2

55

26%

LEVEL 3

64

30%

LEVEL 4

64

30%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

163
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

19

8%

LEVEL 2

46

20%

LEVEL 3

81

36%

LEVEL 4

82

36%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

39

61%

LEVEL 2

21

33%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

31

53%

LEVEL 2

18

31%

LEVEL 3

8

14%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

132
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

48

20%

LEVEL 2

64

26%

LEVEL 3

67

27%

LEVEL 4

65

27%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

168
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

39

15%

LEVEL 2

55

21%

LEVEL 3

84

32%

LEVEL 4

84

32%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

20

63%

LEVEL 2

12

38%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

11

44%

LEVEL 2

9

36%

LEVEL 3

5

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

5

45%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

125
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

66

25%

LEVEL 2

74

28%

LEVEL 3

65

25%

LEVEL 4

60

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

167
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

48

17%

LEVEL 2

63

23%

LEVEL 3

86

31%

LEVEL 4

81

29%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

122
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

60

24%

LEVEL 2

66

27%

LEVEL 3

63

25%

LEVEL 4

59

24%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

154
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

43

17%

LEVEL 2

57

22%

LEVEL 3

80

31%

LEVEL 4

74

29%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

8

29%

LEVEL 2

10

36%

LEVEL 3

4

14%

LEVEL 4

6

21%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

19
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

7

21%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

9

27%

LEVEL 4

10

30%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.