Skip to Content
Main content

MATH & SCIENCE EXPLORATORY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

259
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

11

3%

LEVEL 2

50

16%

LEVEL 3

86

27%

LEVEL 4

173

54%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

250
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

47

15%

LEVEL 3

112

37%

LEVEL 4

138

45%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

133
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

24

15%

LEVEL 3

31

19%

LEVEL 4

102

63%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

125
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

20

14%

LEVEL 3

49

33%

LEVEL 4

76

52%

MALE

PROFICIENT

126
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

26

16%

LEVEL 3

55

35%

LEVEL 4

71

45%

MALE

PROFICIENT

125
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

27

17%

LEVEL 3

63

40%

LEVEL 4

62

39%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

3

38%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

24
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

7

21%

LEVEL 4

17

52%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

35
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

15%

LEVEL 3

14

34%

LEVEL 4

21

51%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

159
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

15

8%

LEVEL 3

43

24%

LEVEL 4

116

65%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

153
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

11

7%

LEVEL 3

65

40%

LEVEL 4

88

54%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

9

38%

LEVEL 3

9

38%

LEVEL 4

6

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

22
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

14

52%

LEVEL 4

8

30%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

47
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

5

7%

LEVEL 2

18

26%

LEVEL 3

22

31%

LEVEL 4

25

36%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

33
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

7

11%

LEVEL 2

25

38%

LEVEL 3

15

23%

LEVEL 4

18

28%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

222
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

35

13%

LEVEL 3

67

25%

LEVEL 4

155

58%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

217
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

32

13%

LEVEL 3

86

34%

LEVEL 4

131

52%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

37
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

15

27%

LEVEL 3

19

35%

LEVEL 4

18

33%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

33
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

4

8%

LEVEL 2

15

29%

LEVEL 3

26

50%

LEVEL 4

7

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

212
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

31

13%

LEVEL 3

63

26%

LEVEL 4

149

60%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

189
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

18

9%

LEVEL 3

79

38%

LEVEL 4

110

52%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

7

10%

LEVEL 2

19

26%

LEVEL 3

23

32%

LEVEL 4

24

33%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

5

5%

LEVEL 2

29

31%

LEVEL 3

33

35%

LEVEL 4

28

29%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.