Skip to Content
Main content

SEVEN BRIDGES MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

487
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 559

LEVEL 1

20

4%

LEVEL 2

52

9%

LEVEL 3

153

27%

LEVEL 4

334

60%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

503
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 572

LEVEL 1

15

3%

LEVEL 2

54

9%

LEVEL 3

152

27%

LEVEL 4

351

61%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

235
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

26

10%

LEVEL 3

79

29%

LEVEL 4

156

58%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

239
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

27

10%

LEVEL 3

79

29%

LEVEL 4

160

58%

MALE

PROFICIENT

252
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

26

9%

LEVEL 3

74

26%

LEVEL 4

178

62%

MALE

PROFICIENT

264
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

7

2%

LEVEL 2

27

9%

LEVEL 3

73

24%

LEVEL 4

191

64%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

21
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

5

23%

LEVEL 4

16

73%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

77
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

12

15%

LEVEL 4

65

82%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

83
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

9

11%

LEVEL 4

74

88%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

364
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 420

LEVEL 1

13

3%

LEVEL 2

43

10%

LEVEL 3

130

31%

LEVEL 4

234

56%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

375
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 430

LEVEL 1

9

2%

LEVEL 2

46

11%

LEVEL 3

129

30%

LEVEL 4

246

57%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

5

15%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

5

15%

LEVEL 4

16

48%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

24
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

5

14%

LEVEL 2

6

17%

LEVEL 3

9

26%

LEVEL 4

15

43%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

476
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 524

LEVEL 1

11

2%

LEVEL 2

37

7%

LEVEL 3

146

28%

LEVEL 4

330

63%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

482
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 531

LEVEL 1

7

1%

LEVEL 2

42

8%

LEVEL 3

138

26%

LEVEL 4

344

65%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

9

26%

LEVEL 2

15

43%

LEVEL 3

7

20%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

21
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

8

20%

LEVEL 2

12

29%

LEVEL 3

14

34%

LEVEL 4

7

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

479
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 544

LEVEL 1

16

3%

LEVEL 2

49

9%

LEVEL 3

151

28%

LEVEL 4

328

60%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

494
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 554

LEVEL 1

9

2%

LEVEL 2

51

9%

LEVEL 3

146

26%

LEVEL 4

348

63%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

4

27%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

6

40%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

6

33%

LEVEL 2

3

17%

LEVEL 3

6

33%

LEVEL 4

3

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.