PS 239 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

81

32%

LEVEL 2

88

35%

LEVEL 3

62

25%

LEVEL 4

22

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

84

35%

LEVEL 2

80

33%

LEVEL 3

57

24%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

38
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

37

31%

LEVEL 2

45

38%

LEVEL 3

29

24%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

28
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

40

34%

LEVEL 2

49

42%

LEVEL 3

21

18%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

44

33%

LEVEL 2

43

32%

LEVEL 3

33

25%

LEVEL 4

13

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

44

35%

LEVEL 2

31

25%

LEVEL 3

36

29%

LEVEL 4

14

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

5

16%

LEVEL 2

13

41%

LEVEL 3

8

25%

LEVEL 4

6

19%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

16
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

6

18%

LEVEL 2

12

35%

LEVEL 3

10

29%

LEVEL 4

6

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

7
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

5

29%

LEVEL 2

5

29%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

2

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

61
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

73

36%

LEVEL 2

70

34%

LEVEL 3

47

23%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

53
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

72

39%

LEVEL 2

61

33%

LEVEL 3

40

22%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

46

24%

LEVEL 2

70

36%

LEVEL 3

56

29%

LEVEL 4

22

11%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

50

26%

LEVEL 2

68

36%

LEVEL 3

54

29%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

35

59%

LEVEL 2

18

31%

LEVEL 3

6

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

34

64%

LEVEL 2

12

23%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

80
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

48

24%

LEVEL 2

74

37%

LEVEL 3

59

29%

LEVEL 4

21

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

73
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

46

26%

LEVEL 2

60

34%

LEVEL 3

52

29%

LEVEL 4

21

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

33

65%

LEVEL 2

14

27%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

38

60%

LEVEL 2

20

32%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

2

15%

LEVEL 2

6

46%

LEVEL 3

5

38%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

6

24%

LEVEL 2

14

56%

LEVEL 3

5

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

79
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

79

33%

LEVEL 2

82

34%

LEVEL 3

57

24%

LEVEL 4

22

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

78

36%

LEVEL 2

66

30%

LEVEL 3

52

24%

LEVEL 4

21

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

70
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

68

32%

LEVEL 2

72

34%

LEVEL 3

52

25%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

61
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

67

35%

LEVEL 2

64

33%

LEVEL 3

43

22%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

14
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

13

30%

LEVEL 2

16

37%

LEVEL 3

10

23%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

17
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

17

34%

LEVEL 2

16

32%

LEVEL 3

14

28%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.