Skip to Content
Main content

YONKERS MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 526

LEVEL 1

255

48%

LEVEL 2

142

27%

LEVEL 3

94

18%

LEVEL 4

35

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 572

LEVEL 1

283

49%

LEVEL 2

135

24%

LEVEL 3

95

17%

LEVEL 4

59

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

72
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

114

45%

LEVEL 2

68

27%

LEVEL 3

56

22%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

85
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

125

44%

LEVEL 2

74

26%

LEVEL 3

49

17%

LEVEL 4

36

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

57
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

141

52%

LEVEL 2

74

27%

LEVEL 3

38

14%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

69
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

158

55%

LEVEL 2

61

21%

LEVEL 3

46

16%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

11

28%

LEVEL 2

11

28%

LEVEL 3

5

13%

LEVEL 4

12

31%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

25
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

28

40%

LEVEL 2

17

24%

LEVEL 3

15

21%

LEVEL 4

10

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

34
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

35

40%

LEVEL 2

19

22%

LEVEL 3

22

25%

LEVEL 4

12

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

18
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

68

62%

LEVEL 2

23

21%

LEVEL 3

15

14%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

35
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

67

50%

LEVEL 2

33

24%

LEVEL 3

23

17%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

68
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

146

48%

LEVEL 2

90

30%

LEVEL 3

54

18%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

65
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

165

55%

LEVEL 2

72

24%

LEVEL 3

43

14%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 439

LEVEL 1

169

38%

LEVEL 2

141

32%

LEVEL 3

94

21%

LEVEL 4

35

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

153
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 475

LEVEL 1

191

40%

LEVEL 2

131

28%

LEVEL 3

94

20%

LEVEL 4

59

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

86

99%

LEVEL 2

1

1%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

92

95%

LEVEL 2

4

4%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

127
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 475

LEVEL 1

212

45%

LEVEL 2

136

29%

LEVEL 3

92

19%

LEVEL 4

35

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

151
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 522

LEVEL 1

241

46%

LEVEL 2

130

25%

LEVEL 3

93

18%

LEVEL 4

58

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

43

84%

LEVEL 2

6

12%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

42

84%

LEVEL 2

5

10%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

19

30%

LEVEL 2

20

32%

LEVEL 3

17

27%

LEVEL 4

7

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

37

37%

LEVEL 2

32

32%

LEVEL 3

21

21%

LEVEL 4

9

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

105
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 463

LEVEL 1

236

51%

LEVEL 2

122

26%

LEVEL 3

77

17%

LEVEL 4

28

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

124
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 473

LEVEL 1

246

52%

LEVEL 2

103

22%

LEVEL 3

74

16%

LEVEL 4

50

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

127
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 518

LEVEL 1

252

49%

LEVEL 2

139

27%

LEVEL 3

92

18%

LEVEL 4

35

7%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.