Skip to Content
Main content

BUFFALO ACADEMY OF SCIENCE CS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

98
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

68

27%

LEVEL 2

89

35%

LEVEL 3

60

24%

LEVEL 4

38

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

140
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

66

25%

LEVEL 2

59

22%

LEVEL 3

80

30%

LEVEL 4

60

23%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

40
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

34

30%

LEVEL 2

41

36%

LEVEL 3

26

23%

LEVEL 4

14

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

57
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

34

29%

LEVEL 2

26

22%

LEVEL 3

33

28%

LEVEL 4

24

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

34

24%

LEVEL 2

48

34%

LEVEL 3

34

24%

LEVEL 4

24

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

83
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

32

22%

LEVEL 2

33

22%

LEVEL 3

47

32%

LEVEL 4

36

24%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

5

14%

LEVEL 2

15

43%

LEVEL 3

8

23%

LEVEL 4

7

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

25
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

5

15%

LEVEL 2

4

12%

LEVEL 3

13

38%

LEVEL 4

12

35%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

11
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

8

30%

LEVEL 2

8

30%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

8

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

13
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

3

14%

LEVEL 2

5

24%

LEVEL 3

6

29%

LEVEL 4

7

33%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

64
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

53

29%

LEVEL 2

63

35%

LEVEL 3

43

24%

LEVEL 4

21

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

92
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

55

28%

LEVEL 2

46

24%

LEVEL 3

54

28%

LEVEL 4

38

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

5

42%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

92
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

48

22%

LEVEL 2

79

36%

LEVEL 3

55

25%

LEVEL 4

37

17%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

131
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

49

21%

LEVEL 2

49

21%

LEVEL 3

73

32%

LEVEL 4

58

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

20

56%

LEVEL 2

10

28%

LEVEL 3

5

14%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

17

47%

LEVEL 2

10

28%

LEVEL 3

7

19%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

94
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

63

27%

LEVEL 2

76

33%

LEVEL 3

57

24%

LEVEL 4

37

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

130
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

58

24%

LEVEL 2

54

22%

LEVEL 3

73

30%

LEVEL 4

57

24%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

5

23%

LEVEL 2

13

59%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

8

35%

LEVEL 2

5

22%

LEVEL 3

7

30%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

9

41%

LEVEL 2

7

32%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

4

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

8

28%

LEVEL 2

7

24%

LEVEL 3

7

24%

LEVEL 4

7

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

92
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

59

25%

LEVEL 2

82

35%

LEVEL 3

58

25%

LEVEL 4

34

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

126
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

58

25%

LEVEL 2

52

22%

LEVEL 3

73

31%

LEVEL 4

53

22%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.