Skip to Content
Main content

CHARTER SCH-EDUC EXCELLENCE GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

263
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

20

5%

LEVEL 2

85

23%

LEVEL 3

134

36%

LEVEL 4

129

35%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

283
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 408

LEVEL 1

36

9%

LEVEL 2

89

22%

LEVEL 3

150

37%

LEVEL 4

133

33%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

128
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

49

26%

LEVEL 3

60

32%

LEVEL 4

68

37%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

147
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

49

24%

LEVEL 3

78

38%

LEVEL 4

69

33%

MALE

PROFICIENT

135
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

36

20%

LEVEL 3

74

41%

LEVEL 4

61

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

136
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

25

12%

LEVEL 2

40

20%

LEVEL 3

72

36%

LEVEL 4

64

32%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

126
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

37

22%

LEVEL 3

64

37%

LEVEL 4

62

36%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

114
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

15

9%

LEVEL 2

32

20%

LEVEL 3

55

34%

LEVEL 4

59

37%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

130
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

10

5%

LEVEL 2

45

24%

LEVEL 3

68

37%

LEVEL 4

62

34%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

157
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

20

9%

LEVEL 2

51

22%

LEVEL 3

92

40%

LEVEL 4

65

29%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

251
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

15

4%

LEVEL 2

79

23%

LEVEL 3

125

36%

LEVEL 4

126

37%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

273
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

29

7%

LEVEL 2

85

22%

LEVEL 3

145

37%

LEVEL 4

128

33%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

5

22%

LEVEL 2

6

26%

LEVEL 3

9

39%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

7

33%

LEVEL 2

4

19%

LEVEL 3

5

24%

LEVEL 4

5

24%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

251
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

16

5%

LEVEL 2

78

23%

LEVEL 3

126

37%

LEVEL 4

125

36%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

275
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

21

6%

LEVEL 2

73

20%

LEVEL 3

144

39%

LEVEL 4

131

36%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

12
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

4

17%

LEVEL 2

7

30%

LEVEL 3

8

35%

LEVEL 4

4

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

15

38%

LEVEL 2

16

41%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

11

22%

LEVEL 3

20

40%

LEVEL 4

17

34%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

7

13%

LEVEL 2

8

15%

LEVEL 3

20

38%

LEVEL 4

17

33%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

226
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

18

6%

LEVEL 2

74

23%

LEVEL 3

114

36%

LEVEL 4

112

35%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

246
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

29

8%

LEVEL 2

81

23%

LEVEL 3

130

37%

LEVEL 4

116

33%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.