HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE PROMISE GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

345
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 536

LEVEL 1

46

9%

LEVEL 2

145

27%

LEVEL 3

183

34%

LEVEL 4

162

30%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

372
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 528

LEVEL 1

44

8%

LEVEL 2

112

21%

LEVEL 3

197

37%

LEVEL 4

175

33%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

187
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

27

9%

LEVEL 2

82

28%

LEVEL 3

101

34%

LEVEL 4

86

29%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

206
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

28

10%

LEVEL 2

60

20%

LEVEL 3

109

37%

LEVEL 4

97

33%

MALE

PROFICIENT

158
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

19

8%

LEVEL 2

63

26%

LEVEL 3

82

34%

LEVEL 4

76

32%

MALE

PROFICIENT

166
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

16

7%

LEVEL 2

52

22%

LEVEL 3

88

38%

LEVEL 4

78

33%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

71%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

71%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

288
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 439

LEVEL 1

36

8%

LEVEL 2

115

26%

LEVEL 3

156

36%

LEVEL 4

132

30%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

301
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 424

LEVEL 1

31

7%

LEVEL 2

92

22%

LEVEL 3

163

38%

LEVEL 4

138

33%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

49
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

10

13%

LEVEL 2

21

26%

LEVEL 3

23

29%

LEVEL 4

26

33%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

54
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

12

14%

LEVEL 2

18

21%

LEVEL 3

27

32%

LEVEL 4

27

32%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

310
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 444

LEVEL 1

30

7%

LEVEL 2

104

23%

LEVEL 3

161

36%

LEVEL 4

149

34%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

335
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 423

LEVEL 1

17

4%

LEVEL 2

71

17%

LEVEL 3

168

40%

LEVEL 4

167

39%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

35
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

16

17%

LEVEL 2

41

45%

LEVEL 3

22

24%

LEVEL 4

13

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

37
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

27

26%

LEVEL 2

41

39%

LEVEL 3

29

28%

LEVEL 4

8

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

338
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 520

LEVEL 1

43

8%

LEVEL 2

139

27%

LEVEL 3

180

35%

LEVEL 4

158

30%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

366
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 518

LEVEL 1

44

8%

LEVEL 2

108

21%

LEVEL 3

193

37%

LEVEL 4

173

33%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

7
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

3

19%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

4

25%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

22

28%

LEVEL 3

25

32%

LEVEL 4

28

36%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

4

5%

LEVEL 2

16

20%

LEVEL 3

34

43%

LEVEL 4

26

33%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

292
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 458

LEVEL 1

43

9%

LEVEL 2

123

27%

LEVEL 3

158

34%

LEVEL 4

134

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

312
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 448

LEVEL 1

40

9%

LEVEL 2

96

21%

LEVEL 3

163

36%

LEVEL 4

149

33%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

300
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 469

LEVEL 1

44

9%

LEVEL 2

125

27%

LEVEL 3

162

35%

LEVEL 4

138

29%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

45
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

20

30%

LEVEL 3

21

31%

LEVEL 4

24

36%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.