GIRLS PREP CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

256
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 419

LEVEL 1

56

13%

LEVEL 2

107

26%

LEVEL 3

149

36%

LEVEL 4

107

26%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

243
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 431

LEVEL 1

66

15%

LEVEL 2

122

28%

LEVEL 3

136

32%

LEVEL 4

107

25%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

57%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

110
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

24

13%

LEVEL 2

54

29%

LEVEL 3

66

35%

LEVEL 4

44

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

109
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

32

16%

LEVEL 2

64

31%

LEVEL 3

63

31%

LEVEL 4

46

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

125
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

30

15%

LEVEL 2

49

24%

LEVEL 3

70

34%

LEVEL 4

55

27%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

114
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

33

17%

LEVEL 2

53

27%

LEVEL 3

64

32%

LEVEL 4

50

25%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

237
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

25

7%

LEVEL 2

81

24%

LEVEL 3

135

39%

LEVEL 4

102

30%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

220
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

38

11%

LEVEL 2

89

26%

LEVEL 3

118

34%

LEVEL 4

102

29%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

31

41%

LEVEL 2

26

34%

LEVEL 3

14

18%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

23
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

28

33%

LEVEL 2

33

39%

LEVEL 3

18

21%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

11

12%

LEVEL 2

21

23%

LEVEL 3

29

31%

LEVEL 4

32

34%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

15

13%

LEVEL 2

32

27%

LEVEL 3

38

32%

LEVEL 4

33

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

195
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

45

14%

LEVEL 2

86

26%

LEVEL 3

120

37%

LEVEL 4

75

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

172
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

51

16%

LEVEL 2

90

29%

LEVEL 3

98

31%

LEVEL 4

74

24%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

223
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

42

12%

LEVEL 2

94

26%

LEVEL 3

129

36%

LEVEL 4

94

26%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

33
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

14

23%

LEVEL 2

13

22%

LEVEL 3

20

33%

LEVEL 4

13

22%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.