GRAND CONCOURSE ACAD CHARTER SCH GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

169
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

33

10%

LEVEL 2

117

37%

LEVEL 3

102

32%

LEVEL 4

67

21%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

243
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

16

5%

LEVEL 2

71

22%

LEVEL 3

128

39%

LEVEL 4

115

35%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

89
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

19

11%

LEVEL 2

67

38%

LEVEL 3

48

27%

LEVEL 4

41

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

138
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

36

20%

LEVEL 3

72

40%

LEVEL 4

66

36%

MALE

PROFICIENT

80
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

14

10%

LEVEL 2

50

35%

LEVEL 3

54

38%

LEVEL 4

26

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

105
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

8

5%

LEVEL 2

35

24%

LEVEL 3

56

38%

LEVEL 4

49

33%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

7

64%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

9

69%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

67
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

8

7%

LEVEL 2

47

39%

LEVEL 3

42

34%

LEVEL 4

25

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

81
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

23

21%

LEVEL 3

42

38%

LEVEL 4

39

35%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

89
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

23

13%

LEVEL 2

65

37%

LEVEL 3

55

31%

LEVEL 4

34

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

142
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

44

23%

LEVEL 3

77

39%

LEVEL 4

65

33%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

156
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

25

9%

LEVEL 2

104

36%

LEVEL 3

93

33%

LEVEL 4

63

22%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

225
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

12

4%

LEVEL 2

58

20%

LEVEL 3

114

39%

LEVEL 4

111

38%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

8

24%

LEVEL 2

13

38%

LEVEL 3

9

26%

LEVEL 4

4

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

4

11%

LEVEL 2

13

37%

LEVEL 3

14

40%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

164
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

29

10%

LEVEL 2

106

35%

LEVEL 3

97

32%

LEVEL 4

67

22%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

234
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

14

4%

LEVEL 2

64

21%

LEVEL 3

123

39%

LEVEL 4

111

36%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

4

20%

LEVEL 2

11

55%

LEVEL 3

5

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

9
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

5

28%

LEVEL 4

4

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

4

13%

LEVEL 2

10

33%

LEVEL 3

9

30%

LEVEL 4

7

23%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

11

20%

LEVEL 3

23

42%

LEVEL 4

19

35%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

153
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

29

10%

LEVEL 2

107

37%

LEVEL 3

93

32%

LEVEL 4

60

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

201
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

14

5%

LEVEL 2

60

22%

LEVEL 3

105

38%

LEVEL 4

96

35%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

160
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

29

10%

LEVEL 2

109

37%

LEVEL 3

99

33%

LEVEL 4

61

20%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

4

19%

LEVEL 2

8

38%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

6

29%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.