AMISTAD DUAL LANGUAGE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

92
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

70

28%

LEVEL 2

87

35%

LEVEL 3

62

25%

LEVEL 4

30

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

115
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

67

25%

LEVEL 2

82

31%

LEVEL 3

69

26%

LEVEL 4

46

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

47

33%

LEVEL 2

51

36%

LEVEL 3

32

23%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

55
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

43

30%

LEVEL 2

44

31%

LEVEL 3

35

25%

LEVEL 4

20

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

48
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

23

21%

LEVEL 2

36

34%

LEVEL 3

30

28%

LEVEL 4

18

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

60
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

24

20%

LEVEL 2

38

31%

LEVEL 3

34

28%

LEVEL 4

26

21%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

9
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

5

50%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

5

63%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

81
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

70

30%

LEVEL 2

79

34%

LEVEL 3

55

24%

LEVEL 4

26

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

97
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

67

28%

LEVEL 2

77

32%

LEVEL 3

59

24%

LEVEL 4

38

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

88
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

51

23%

LEVEL 2

82

37%

LEVEL 3

60

27%

LEVEL 4

28

13%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

111
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

50

21%

LEVEL 2

72

31%

LEVEL 3

66

28%

LEVEL 4

45

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

19

68%

LEVEL 2

5

18%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

17

55%

LEVEL 2

10

32%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

82
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

34

18%

LEVEL 2

71

38%

LEVEL 3

54

29%

LEVEL 4

28

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

106
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

34

17%

LEVEL 2

58

29%

LEVEL 3

63

32%

LEVEL 4

43

22%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

10
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

36

58%

LEVEL 2

16

26%

LEVEL 3

8

13%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

9
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

33

50%

LEVEL 2

24

36%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

6

13%

LEVEL 2

14

30%

LEVEL 3

18

38%

LEVEL 4

9

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

8

15%

LEVEL 2

12

23%

LEVEL 3

17

32%

LEVEL 4

16

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

64

32%

LEVEL 2

73

36%

LEVEL 3

44

22%

LEVEL 4

21

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

59

28%

LEVEL 2

70

33%

LEVEL 3

52

25%

LEVEL 4

30

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

73
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

58

29%

LEVEL 2

68

34%

LEVEL 3

51

26%

LEVEL 4

22

11%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

99
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

54

24%

LEVEL 2

69

31%

LEVEL 3

59

27%

LEVEL 4

40

18%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

19
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

12

24%

LEVEL 2

19

38%

LEVEL 3

11

22%

LEVEL 4

8

16%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

16
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

13

31%

LEVEL 2

13

31%

LEVEL 3

10

24%

LEVEL 4

6

14%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.