Skip to Content
Main content

CHANNEL VIEW SCHOOL-RESEARCH GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

114
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

55

21%

LEVEL 2

93

35%

LEVEL 3

90

34%

LEVEL 4

24

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

57

21%

LEVEL 2

90

33%

LEVEL 3

88

32%

LEVEL 4

41

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

66
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

34

23%

LEVEL 2

51

34%

LEVEL 3

51

34%

LEVEL 4

15

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

68
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

34

22%

LEVEL 2

51

33%

LEVEL 3

42

27%

LEVEL 4

26

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

48
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

21

19%

LEVEL 2

42

38%

LEVEL 3

39

35%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

23

19%

LEVEL 2

39

32%

LEVEL 3

46

37%

LEVEL 4

15

12%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

20
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

12

36%

LEVEL 3

14

42%

LEVEL 4

6

18%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

8

35%

LEVEL 3

9

39%

LEVEL 4

5

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

12
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

5

20%

LEVEL 2

8

32%

LEVEL 3

10

40%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

12
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

5

21%

LEVEL 2

7

29%

LEVEL 3

8

33%

LEVEL 4

4

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

30
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

29

33%

LEVEL 2

29

33%

LEVEL 3

23

26%

LEVEL 4

7

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

41
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

26

26%

LEVEL 2

33

33%

LEVEL 3

27

27%

LEVEL 4

14

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

47
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

20

18%

LEVEL 2

42

39%

LEVEL 3

41

38%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

52
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

24

21%

LEVEL 2

41

35%

LEVEL 3

39

33%

LEVEL 4

13

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

109
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

39

17%

LEVEL 2

84

36%

LEVEL 3

87

38%

LEVEL 4

22

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

125
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

38

16%

LEVEL 2

78

32%

LEVEL 3

85

35%

LEVEL 4

40

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

16

53%

LEVEL 2

9

30%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

19

54%

LEVEL 2

12

34%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

112
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

52

20%

LEVEL 2

92

36%

LEVEL 3

88

34%

LEVEL 4

24

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

129
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

51

19%

LEVEL 2

87

33%

LEVEL 3

88

33%

LEVEL 4

41

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

6

67%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

12

20%

LEVEL 2

16

26%

LEVEL 3

27

44%

LEVEL 4

6

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

4

6%

LEVEL 2

22

32%

LEVEL 3

29

43%

LEVEL 4

13

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

81
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

43

21%

LEVEL 2

77

38%

LEVEL 3

63

31%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

87
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

53

25%

LEVEL 2

68

33%

LEVEL 3

59

28%

LEVEL 4

28

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

109
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

54

21%

LEVEL 2

91

36%

LEVEL 3

85

33%

LEVEL 4

24

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

123
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

53

20%

LEVEL 2

88

33%

LEVEL 3

83

31%

LEVEL 4

40

15%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

5

63%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

5

42%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.