KAPPA III GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

83
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

189

52%

LEVEL 2

90

25%

LEVEL 3

56

15%

LEVEL 4

27

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

108
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

129

36%

LEVEL 2

123

34%

LEVEL 3

59

16%

LEVEL 4

49

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

35
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

85

52%

LEVEL 2

42

26%

LEVEL 3

22

14%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

46
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

58

34%

LEVEL 2

65

38%

LEVEL 3

27

16%

LEVEL 4

19

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

48
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

104

52%

LEVEL 2

48

24%

LEVEL 3

34

17%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

62
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

71

37%

LEVEL 2

58

30%

LEVEL 3

32

17%

LEVEL 4

30

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

54

55%

LEVEL 2

28

29%

LEVEL 3

11

11%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

24
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

33

36%

LEVEL 2

35

38%

LEVEL 3

13

14%

LEVEL 4

11

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

60
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

128

51%

LEVEL 2

61

24%

LEVEL 3

40

16%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

77
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

93

36%

LEVEL 2

85

33%

LEVEL 3

43

17%

LEVEL 4

34

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

121

43%

LEVEL 2

84

30%

LEVEL 3

53

19%

LEVEL 4

26

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

103
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

71

26%

LEVEL 2

101

37%

LEVEL 3

54

20%

LEVEL 4

49

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

68

87%

LEVEL 2

6

8%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

58

68%

LEVEL 2

22

26%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

82
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

164

49%

LEVEL 2

86

26%

LEVEL 3

55

17%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

105
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

105

32%

LEVEL 2

117

36%

LEVEL 3

56

17%

LEVEL 4

49

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

25

83%

LEVEL 2

4

13%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

24

73%

LEVEL 2

6

18%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

9

38%

LEVEL 2

11

46%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

7

24%

LEVEL 2

11

38%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

5

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

79
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

180

53%

LEVEL 2

79

23%

LEVEL 3

54

16%

LEVEL 4

25

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

97
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

122

37%

LEVEL 2

112

34%

LEVEL 3

53

16%

LEVEL 4

44

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

71
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

167

53%

LEVEL 2

79

25%

LEVEL 3

50

16%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

97
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

118

37%

LEVEL 2

106

33%

LEVEL 3

53

17%

LEVEL 4

44

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

22

49%

LEVEL 2

11

24%

LEVEL 3

6

13%

LEVEL 4

6

13%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

11
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

11

28%

LEVEL 2

17

44%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

5

13%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.