Skip to Content
Main content

COMMUNITY MATH AND SCIENCE PRE GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

22
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

159

75%

LEVEL 2

30

14%

LEVEL 3

20

9%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

30
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

118

61%

LEVEL 2

44

23%

LEVEL 3

27

14%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

9
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

69

74%

LEVEL 2

15

16%

LEVEL 3

8

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

14
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

54

64%

LEVEL 2

17

20%

LEVEL 3

13

15%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

13
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

90

76%

LEVEL 2

15

13%

LEVEL 3

12

10%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

16
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

64

60%

LEVEL 2

27

25%

LEVEL 3

14

13%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

15

56%

LEVEL 2

8

30%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

9

50%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

136

78%

LEVEL 2

22

13%

LEVEL 3

15

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

23
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

103

64%

LEVEL 2

36

22%

LEVEL 3

21

13%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

17
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

117

75%

LEVEL 2

22

14%

LEVEL 3

16

10%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

24
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

78

57%

LEVEL 2

36

26%

LEVEL 3

22

16%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

42

76%

LEVEL 2

8

15%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

40

74%

LEVEL 2

8

15%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

21
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

53

55%

LEVEL 2

22

23%

LEVEL 3

19

20%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

26
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

33

37%

LEVEL 2

31

34%

LEVEL 3

23

26%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

106

92%

LEVEL 2

8

7%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

85

83%

LEVEL 2

13

13%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

6

75%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

153

75%

LEVEL 2

29

14%

LEVEL 3

19

9%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

113

61%

LEVEL 2

43

23%

LEVEL 3

26

14%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

20
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

132

76%

LEVEL 2

22

13%

LEVEL 3

18

10%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

26
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

111

62%

LEVEL 2

41

23%

LEVEL 3

23

13%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

27

73%

LEVEL 2

8

22%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

7

50%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.