MS 324 PATRIA MIRABAL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

82
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

118

38%

LEVEL 2

108

35%

LEVEL 3

58

19%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

94

37%

LEVEL 2

70

28%

LEVEL 3

58

23%

LEVEL 4

32

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

48
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

52

34%

LEVEL 2

52

34%

LEVEL 3

35

23%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

39

30%

LEVEL 2

37

29%

LEVEL 3

32

25%

LEVEL 4

20

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

34
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

66

42%

LEVEL 2

56

36%

LEVEL 3

23

15%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

55

44%

LEVEL 2

33

26%

LEVEL 3

26

21%

LEVEL 4

12

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

20

56%

LEVEL 2

11

31%

LEVEL 3

5

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

17

53%

LEVEL 2

6

19%

LEVEL 3

7

22%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

73
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

95

37%

LEVEL 2

91

35%

LEVEL 3

50

19%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

71
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

75

36%

LEVEL 2

61

29%

LEVEL 3

43

21%

LEVEL 4

28

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

71

29%

LEVEL 2

93

38%

LEVEL 3

54

22%

LEVEL 4

24

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

83
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

61

30%

LEVEL 2

59

29%

LEVEL 3

51

25%

LEVEL 4

32

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

47

71%

LEVEL 2

15

23%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

33

65%

LEVEL 2

11

22%

LEVEL 3

7

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

65
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

51

27%

LEVEL 2

72

38%

LEVEL 3

44

23%

LEVEL 4

21

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

76
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

46

28%

LEVEL 2

43

26%

LEVEL 3

49

30%

LEVEL 4

27

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

17
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

67

56%

LEVEL 2

36

30%

LEVEL 3

14

12%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

14
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

48

54%

LEVEL 2

27

30%

LEVEL 3

9

10%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

7

30%

LEVEL 2

6

26%

LEVEL 3

6

26%

LEVEL 4

4

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

8

42%

LEVEL 2

4

21%

LEVEL 3

6

32%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

111

39%

LEVEL 2

102

36%

LEVEL 3

52

18%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

86

37%

LEVEL 2

66

28%

LEVEL 3

52

22%

LEVEL 4

31

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

71
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

98

38%

LEVEL 2

90

35%

LEVEL 3

50

19%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

81
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

76

36%

LEVEL 2

56

26%

LEVEL 3

54

25%

LEVEL 4

27

13%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

11
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

20

41%

LEVEL 2

18

37%

LEVEL 3

8

16%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

18

44%

LEVEL 2

14

34%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

5

12%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.