PS 254 ROSA PARKS SCHOOL (THE) GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

147
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

62

21%

LEVEL 2

91

30%

LEVEL 3

95

32%

LEVEL 4

52

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

182
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

35

12%

LEVEL 2

75

26%

LEVEL 3

88

30%

LEVEL 4

94

32%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

70
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

25

18%

LEVEL 2

42

31%

LEVEL 3

43

31%

LEVEL 4

27

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

83
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

16

12%

LEVEL 2

40

29%

LEVEL 3

47

34%

LEVEL 4

36

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

77
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

37

23%

LEVEL 2

49

30%

LEVEL 3

52

32%

LEVEL 4

25

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

99
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

19

12%

LEVEL 2

35

23%

LEVEL 3

41

27%

LEVEL 4

58

38%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

23
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

13

35%

LEVEL 3

12

32%

LEVEL 4

11

30%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

28
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

7

19%

LEVEL 3

7

19%

LEVEL 4

21

57%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

10
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

41%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

5

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

15
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

12

71%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

8

62%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

108
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

52

23%

LEVEL 2

68

30%

LEVEL 3

75

33%

LEVEL 4

33

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

128
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

28

13%

LEVEL 2

64

29%

LEVEL 3

72

33%

LEVEL 4

56

25%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

131
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

44

17%

LEVEL 2

80

31%

LEVEL 3

81

32%

LEVEL 4

50

20%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

169
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

27

11%

LEVEL 2

58

23%

LEVEL 3

82

32%

LEVEL 4

87

34%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

18

40%

LEVEL 2

11

24%

LEVEL 3

14

31%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

8

21%

LEVEL 2

17

45%

LEVEL 3

6

16%

LEVEL 4

7

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

130
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

53

21%

LEVEL 2

74

29%

LEVEL 3

79

31%

LEVEL 4

51

20%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

176
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

18

7%

LEVEL 2

55

22%

LEVEL 3

84

34%

LEVEL 4

92

37%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

17
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

9

21%

LEVEL 2

17

40%

LEVEL 3

16

37%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

17

40%

LEVEL 2

20

47%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

8

15%

LEVEL 2

17

32%

LEVEL 3

14

26%

LEVEL 4

14

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

11

17%

LEVEL 3

26

40%

LEVEL 4

26

40%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

119
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

54

22%

LEVEL 2

74

30%

LEVEL 3

81

33%

LEVEL 4

38

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

130
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

33

15%

LEVEL 2

64

28%

LEVEL 3

62

27%

LEVEL 4

68

30%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

138
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

56

20%

LEVEL 2

85

30%

LEVEL 3

86

31%

LEVEL 4

52

19%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

172
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

27

10%

LEVEL 2

72

27%

LEVEL 3

82

30%

LEVEL 4

90

33%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

6

29%

LEVEL 2

6

29%

LEVEL 3

9

43%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

8

38%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

6

29%

LEVEL 4

4

19%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.