TOMPKINS SQUARE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

71

29%

LEVEL 2

54

22%

LEVEL 3

66

27%

LEVEL 4

56

23%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

143
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

54

21%

LEVEL 2

65

25%

LEVEL 3

73

28%

LEVEL 4

70

27%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

67
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

39

28%

LEVEL 2

33

24%

LEVEL 3

33

24%

LEVEL 4

34

24%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

76
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

26

19%

LEVEL 2

38

27%

LEVEL 3

39

28%

LEVEL 4

37

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

55
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

32

30%

LEVEL 2

21

19%

LEVEL 3

33

31%

LEVEL 4

22

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

67
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

28

23%

LEVEL 2

27

22%

LEVEL 3

34

28%

LEVEL 4

33

27%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

44
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

5

8%

LEVEL 2

15

23%

LEVEL 3

26

41%

LEVEL 4

18

28%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

46
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

5

8%

LEVEL 2

12

19%

LEVEL 3

23

37%

LEVEL 4

23

37%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

37
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

5

11%

LEVEL 3

12

27%

LEVEL 4

25

57%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

47
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

7

13%

LEVEL 3

13

24%

LEVEL 4

34

62%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

20

50%

LEVEL 2

9

23%

LEVEL 3

8

20%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

15

45%

LEVEL 2

11

33%

LEVEL 3

7

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

41

46%

LEVEL 2

24

27%

LEVEL 3

19

21%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

38
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

31

30%

LEVEL 2

33

32%

LEVEL 3

29

28%

LEVEL 4

9

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

26

14%

LEVEL 2

44

23%

LEVEL 3

63

33%

LEVEL 4

56

30%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

136
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

24

11%

LEVEL 2

50

24%

LEVEL 3

67

32%

LEVEL 4

69

33%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

45

78%

LEVEL 2

10

17%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

30

58%

LEVEL 2

15

29%

LEVEL 3

6

12%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

122
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

68

28%

LEVEL 2

50

21%

LEVEL 3

66

28%

LEVEL 4

56

23%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

7

10%

LEVEL 2

12

18%

LEVEL 3

19

28%

LEVEL 4

30

44%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

11

13%

LEVEL 2

15

17%

LEVEL 3

33

38%

LEVEL 4

28

32%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

64

36%

LEVEL 2

42

23%

LEVEL 3

47

26%

LEVEL 4

26

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

43

25%

LEVEL 2

50

29%

LEVEL 3

40

23%

LEVEL 4

42

24%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

119
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

57

26%

LEVEL 2

45

20%

LEVEL 3

64

29%

LEVEL 4

55

25%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

136
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

50

20%

LEVEL 2

59

24%

LEVEL 3

70

29%

LEVEL 4

66

27%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

14

54%

LEVEL 2

9

35%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

4

24%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

4

24%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.