Skip to Content
Main content

COMP MODEL SCH PROJECT MS 327 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

61

22%

LEVEL 2

98

35%

LEVEL 3

71

25%

LEVEL 4

51

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

166
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

59

20%

LEVEL 2

63

22%

LEVEL 3

86

30%

LEVEL 4

80

28%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

73
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

22

16%

LEVEL 2

43

31%

LEVEL 3

43

31%

LEVEL 4

30

22%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

97
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

16

11%

LEVEL 2

32

22%

LEVEL 3

45

31%

LEVEL 4

52

36%

MALE

PROFICIENT

49
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

39

27%

LEVEL 2

55

38%

LEVEL 3

28

20%

LEVEL 4

21

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

69
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

43

30%

LEVEL 2

31

22%

LEVEL 3

41

29%

LEVEL 4

28

20%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

23
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

13

25%

LEVEL 2

15

29%

LEVEL 3

12

24%

LEVEL 4

11

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

97
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

47

21%

LEVEL 2

80

36%

LEVEL 3

58

26%

LEVEL 4

39

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

135
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

46

20%

LEVEL 2

52

22%

LEVEL 3

74

32%

LEVEL 4

61

26%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

25

11%

LEVEL 2

85

38%

LEVEL 3

66

29%

LEVEL 4

50

22%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

23

10%

LEVEL 2

54

23%

LEVEL 3

77

33%

LEVEL 4

77

33%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

36

65%

LEVEL 2

13

24%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

36

63%

LEVEL 2

9

16%

LEVEL 3

9

16%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

116
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

44

18%

LEVEL 2

87

35%

LEVEL 3

67

27%

LEVEL 4

49

20%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

157
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

42

16%

LEVEL 2

59

23%

LEVEL 3

78

30%

LEVEL 4

79

31%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

17

50%

LEVEL 2

11

32%

LEVEL 3

4

12%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

17

57%

LEVEL 2

4

13%

LEVEL 3

8

27%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

2

12%

LEVEL 2

5

29%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

7

41%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

10

32%

LEVEL 2

5

16%

LEVEL 3

6

19%

LEVEL 4

10

32%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

112
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

59

22%

LEVEL 2

93

35%

LEVEL 3

68

26%

LEVEL 4

44

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

150
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

49

19%

LEVEL 2

58

23%

LEVEL 3

80

31%

LEVEL 4

70

27%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

108
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

52

22%

LEVEL 2

81

34%

LEVEL 3

62

26%

LEVEL 4

46

19%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

149
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

49

20%

LEVEL 2

51

20%

LEVEL 3

76

31%

LEVEL 4

73

29%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

14
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

9

23%

LEVEL 2

17

43%

LEVEL 3

9

23%

LEVEL 4

5

13%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

17
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

10

26%

LEVEL 2

12

31%

LEVEL 3

10

26%

LEVEL 4

7

18%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.