HELLENIC CLASSICAL CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

236
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

14

4%

LEVEL 2

66

21%

LEVEL 3

90

28%

LEVEL 4

146

46%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

274
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

12

4%

LEVEL 2

31

10%

LEVEL 3

105

33%

LEVEL 4

169

53%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

120
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

28

18%

LEVEL 3

43

28%

LEVEL 4

77

50%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

140
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

12

8%

LEVEL 3

51

32%

LEVEL 4

89

56%

MALE

PROFICIENT

116
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

38

24%

LEVEL 3

47

29%

LEVEL 4

69

43%

MALE

PROFICIENT

134
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

19

12%

LEVEL 3

54

34%

LEVEL 4

80

50%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

4

44%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

4

57%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

7

88%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

82
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

12

13%

LEVEL 3

26

28%

LEVEL 4

56

60%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

86
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

8

8%

LEVEL 3

27

28%

LEVEL 4

59

61%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

41
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

5

7%

LEVEL 2

21

31%

LEVEL 3

17

25%

LEVEL 4

24

36%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

43
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

4

8%

LEVEL 2

6

11%

LEVEL 3

20

38%

LEVEL 4

23

43%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

98
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

30

22%

LEVEL 3

40

30%

LEVEL 4

58

43%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

127
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

16

11%

LEVEL 3

53

36%

LEVEL 4

74

50%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

226
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

55

19%

LEVEL 3

80

27%

LEVEL 4

146

50%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

258
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

7

2%

LEVEL 2

21

7%

LEVEL 3

92

32%

LEVEL 4

166

58%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

3

13%

LEVEL 2

11

46%

LEVEL 3

10

42%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

5

16%

LEVEL 2

10

32%

LEVEL 3

13

42%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

235
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

13

4%

LEVEL 2

61

20%

LEVEL 3

90

29%

LEVEL 4

145

47%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

5

71%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

110
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

21

16%

LEVEL 3

35

26%

LEVEL 4

75

56%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

128
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

8

6%

LEVEL 3

38

27%

LEVEL 4

90

65%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

126
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

10

6%

LEVEL 2

45

25%

LEVEL 3

55

30%

LEVEL 4

71

39%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

146
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

23

13%

LEVEL 3

67

38%

LEVEL 4

79

44%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

230
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

14

5%

LEVEL 2

57

19%

LEVEL 3

87

29%

LEVEL 4

143

48%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

9

60%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

3

20%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.