ACHIEVEMENT FIRST CROWN HEIGHTS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

362
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 545

LEVEL 1

61

11%

LEVEL 2

122

22%

LEVEL 3

169

31%

LEVEL 4

193

35%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

401
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 551

LEVEL 1

41

7%

LEVEL 2

109

20%

LEVEL 3

204

37%

LEVEL 4

197

36%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

183
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

25

9%

LEVEL 2

69

25%

LEVEL 3

83

30%

LEVEL 4

100

36%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

216
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

17

6%

LEVEL 2

58

20%

LEVEL 3

99

34%

LEVEL 4

117

40%

MALE

PROFICIENT

179
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

36

13%

LEVEL 2

53

20%

LEVEL 3

86

32%

LEVEL 4

93

35%

MALE

PROFICIENT

185
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

24

9%

LEVEL 2

51

20%

LEVEL 3

105

40%

LEVEL 4

80

31%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

4

57%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

347
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 521

LEVEL 1

55

11%

LEVEL 2

119

23%

LEVEL 3

162

31%

LEVEL 4

185

36%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

385
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 524

LEVEL 1

37

7%

LEVEL 2

102

19%

LEVEL 3

198

38%

LEVEL 4

187

36%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

4

24%

LEVEL 2

3

18%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

5

29%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

6

43%

LEVEL 4

3

21%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

318
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 445

LEVEL 1

34

8%

LEVEL 2

93

21%

LEVEL 3

144

32%

LEVEL 4

174

39%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

348
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 453

LEVEL 1

23

5%

LEVEL 2

82

18%

LEVEL 3

169

37%

LEVEL 4

179

40%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

44
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

27

27%

LEVEL 2

29

29%

LEVEL 3

25

25%

LEVEL 4

19

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

53
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

18

18%

LEVEL 2

27

28%

LEVEL 3

35

36%

LEVEL 4

18

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

12

10%

LEVEL 2

23

19%

LEVEL 3

26

22%

LEVEL 4

57

48%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

91
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

9

8%

LEVEL 2

16

14%

LEVEL 3

41

35%

LEVEL 4

50

43%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

279
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 427

LEVEL 1

49

11%

LEVEL 2

99

23%

LEVEL 3

143

33%

LEVEL 4

136

32%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

310
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 435

LEVEL 1

32

7%

LEVEL 2

93

21%

LEVEL 3

163

37%

LEVEL 4

147

34%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

345
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 510

LEVEL 1

54

11%

LEVEL 2

111

22%

LEVEL 3

159

31%

LEVEL 4

186

36%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

17
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

7

20%

LEVEL 2

11

31%

LEVEL 3

10

29%

LEVEL 4

7

20%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.