ACHIEVEMENT FIRST E NY CHARTER SCH GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

355
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

10

2%

LEVEL 2

57

14%

LEVEL 3

126

30%

LEVEL 4

229

54%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

361
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

12

3%

LEVEL 2

45

11%

LEVEL 3

132

32%

LEVEL 4

229

55%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

184
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

32

15%

LEVEL 3

62

28%

LEVEL 4

122

56%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

189
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

30

13%

LEVEL 3

62

28%

LEVEL 4

127

57%

MALE

PROFICIENT

171
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

25

12%

LEVEL 3

64

32%

LEVEL 4

107

53%

MALE

PROFICIENT

172
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

15

8%

LEVEL 3

70

36%

LEVEL 4

102

53%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

265
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

45

14%

LEVEL 3

92

29%

LEVEL 4

173

54%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

270
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

10

3%

LEVEL 2

36

11%

LEVEL 3

104

33%

LEVEL 4

166

53%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

80
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

10

11%

LEVEL 3

32

35%

LEVEL 4

48

53%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

78
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

9

10%

LEVEL 3

23

26%

LEVEL 4

55

62%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

320
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

39

11%

LEVEL 3

106

29%

LEVEL 4

214

59%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

338
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

31

8%

LEVEL 3

121

33%

LEVEL 4

217

58%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

35
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

8

13%

LEVEL 2

18

30%

LEVEL 3

20

33%

LEVEL 4

15

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

23
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

10

21%

LEVEL 2

14

30%

LEVEL 3

11

23%

LEVEL 4

12

26%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

352
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

9

2%

LEVEL 2

56

13%

LEVEL 3

125

30%

LEVEL 4

227

54%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

356
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

11

3%

LEVEL 2

44

11%

LEVEL 3

128

31%

LEVEL 4

228

55%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

4

57%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

10%

LEVEL 3

12

24%

LEVEL 4

32

65%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

11%

LEVEL 3

15

27%

LEVEL 4

34

62%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

311
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

10

3%

LEVEL 2

52

14%

LEVEL 3

114

31%

LEVEL 4

197

53%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

312
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

12

3%

LEVEL 2

39

11%

LEVEL 3

117

32%

LEVEL 4

195

54%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

341
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

9

2%

LEVEL 2

52

13%

LEVEL 3

119

30%

LEVEL 4

222

55%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

14
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

5

25%

LEVEL 3

7

35%

LEVEL 4

7

35%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.