WILLIAMSBURG COLLEGIATE CHRTR SCH GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

38

16%

LEVEL 2

60

25%

LEVEL 3

71

30%

LEVEL 4

67

28%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

156
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

22

9%

LEVEL 2

59

25%

LEVEL 3

69

29%

LEVEL 4

87

37%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

70
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

17

14%

LEVEL 2

35

29%

LEVEL 3

38

31%

LEVEL 4

32

26%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

80
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

29

25%

LEVEL 3

32

28%

LEVEL 4

48

42%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

21

18%

LEVEL 2

25

22%

LEVEL 3

33

29%

LEVEL 4

35

31%

MALE

PROFICIENT

76
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

16

13%

LEVEL 2

30

25%

LEVEL 3

37

30%

LEVEL 4

39

32%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

97
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

29

17%

LEVEL 2

42

25%

LEVEL 3

43

26%

LEVEL 4

54

32%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

110
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

16

10%

LEVEL 2

42

25%

LEVEL 3

48

29%

LEVEL 4

62

37%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

121
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

16

9%

LEVEL 2

48

26%

LEVEL 3

58

31%

LEVEL 4

63

34%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

141
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

44

23%

LEVEL 3

58

30%

LEVEL 4

83

43%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

22

43%

LEVEL 2

12

24%

LEVEL 3

13

25%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

14

32%

LEVEL 2

15

34%

LEVEL 3

11

25%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

136
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

30

14%

LEVEL 2

55

25%

LEVEL 3

69

31%

LEVEL 4

67

30%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

154
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

19

8%

LEVEL 2

51

23%

LEVEL 3

67

30%

LEVEL 4

87

39%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

8

53%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

8

62%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

8

19%

LEVEL 2

7

16%

LEVEL 3

11

26%

LEVEL 4

17

40%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

10

27%

LEVEL 3

12

32%

LEVEL 4

13

35%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

110
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

30

16%

LEVEL 2

53

27%

LEVEL 3

60

31%

LEVEL 4

50

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

131
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

20

10%

LEVEL 2

49

25%

LEVEL 3

57

29%

LEVEL 4

74

37%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

133
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

35

16%

LEVEL 2

51

23%

LEVEL 3

67

31%

LEVEL 4

66

30%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

3

18%

LEVEL 2

9

53%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.