ACADEMY OF PUBLIC RELATIONS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

10
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

132

64%

LEVEL 2

64

31%

LEVEL 3

10

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

24
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

117

58%

LEVEL 2

60

30%

LEVEL 3

21

10%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

63

62%

LEVEL 2

37

37%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

10
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

54

57%

LEVEL 2

31

33%

LEVEL 3

8

8%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

9
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

69

66%

LEVEL 2

27

26%

LEVEL 3

9

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

14
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

63

59%

LEVEL 2

29

27%

LEVEL 3

13

12%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

23

56%

LEVEL 2

14

34%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

105

66%

LEVEL 2

47

30%

LEVEL 3

6

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

91

62%

LEVEL 2

43

29%

LEVEL 3

11

7%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

9
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

95

58%

LEVEL 2

60

37%

LEVEL 3

9

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

23
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

83

53%

LEVEL 2

52

33%

LEVEL 3

20

13%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

37

88%

LEVEL 2

4

10%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

34

79%

LEVEL 2

8

19%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

8
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

90

60%

LEVEL 2

51

34%

LEVEL 3

8

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

22
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

79

53%

LEVEL 2

49

33%

LEVEL 3

19

13%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

42

74%

LEVEL 2

13

23%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

38

75%

LEVEL 2

11

22%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

9

53%

LEVEL 2

8

47%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

12

57%

LEVEL 2

6

29%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

123

65%

LEVEL 2

56

30%

LEVEL 3

10

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

105

58%

LEVEL 2

54

30%

LEVEL 3

18

10%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

101

64%

LEVEL 2

51

32%

LEVEL 3

7

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

20
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

83

56%

LEVEL 2

46

31%

LEVEL 3

18

12%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

31

66%

LEVEL 2

13

28%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

34

65%

LEVEL 2

14

27%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.