NEW HEIGHTS ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

102
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

138

37%

LEVEL 2

132

35%

LEVEL 3

78

21%

LEVEL 4

24

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

174

47%

LEVEL 2

125

34%

LEVEL 3

46

12%

LEVEL 4

25

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

65

36%

LEVEL 2

67

37%

LEVEL 3

43

23%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

31
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

90

49%

LEVEL 2

61

34%

LEVEL 3

20

11%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

73

39%

LEVEL 2

65

34%

LEVEL 3

35

19%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

40
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

84

45%

LEVEL 2

64

34%

LEVEL 3

26

14%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

95
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

133

38%

LEVEL 2

123

35%

LEVEL 3

72

21%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

65
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

158

47%

LEVEL 2

110

33%

LEVEL 3

42

13%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

98
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

101

32%

LEVEL 2

116

37%

LEVEL 3

76

24%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

61
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

143

46%

LEVEL 2

105

34%

LEVEL 3

38

12%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

37

65%

LEVEL 2

16

28%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

31

51%

LEVEL 2

20

33%

LEVEL 3

8

13%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

101
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

93

30%

LEVEL 2

116

37%

LEVEL 3

77

25%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

68
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

109

38%

LEVEL 2

110

38%

LEVEL 3

43

15%

LEVEL 4

25

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

45

73%

LEVEL 2

16

26%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

65

78%

LEVEL 2

15

18%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

8

30%

LEVEL 2

13

48%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

9

47%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

96
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

130

38%

LEVEL 2

119

34%

LEVEL 3

73

21%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

165

47%

LEVEL 2

119

34%

LEVEL 3

44

13%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

93
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

118

36%

LEVEL 2

113

35%

LEVEL 3

72

22%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

20

42%

LEVEL 2

19

40%

LEVEL 3

6

13%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.