MIDDLE SCHOOL 322 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

63
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

156

53%

LEVEL 2

76

26%

LEVEL 3

39

13%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

69
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

205

53%

LEVEL 2

111

29%

LEVEL 3

42

11%

LEVEL 4

27

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

42
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

75

48%

LEVEL 2

40

25%

LEVEL 3

25

16%

LEVEL 4

17

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

31
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

83

48%

LEVEL 2

60

34%

LEVEL 3

18

10%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

21
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

81

59%

LEVEL 2

36

26%

LEVEL 3

14

10%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

122

58%

LEVEL 2

51

24%

LEVEL 3

24

11%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

6

67%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

7

54%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

58
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

147

53%

LEVEL 2

73

26%

LEVEL 3

36

13%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

67
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

193

53%

LEVEL 2

105

29%

LEVEL 3

40

11%

LEVEL 4

27

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

59
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

119

48%

LEVEL 2

69

28%

LEVEL 3

36

15%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

66
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

148

47%

LEVEL 2

100

32%

LEVEL 3

40

13%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

37

77%

LEVEL 2

7

15%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

57

80%

LEVEL 2

11

15%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

57
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

69

38%

LEVEL 2

55

30%

LEVEL 3

36

20%

LEVEL 4

21

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

60
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

89

40%

LEVEL 2

72

33%

LEVEL 3

34

15%

LEVEL 4

26

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

87

76%

LEVEL 2

21

18%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

9
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

116

71%

LEVEL 2

39

24%

LEVEL 3

8

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

4

31%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

12

63%

LEVEL 2

4

21%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

152

54%

LEVEL 2

72

26%

LEVEL 3

35

12%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

193

53%

LEVEL 2

107

29%

LEVEL 3

41

11%

LEVEL 4

25

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

49
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

85

44%

LEVEL 2

61

31%

LEVEL 3

31

16%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

50
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

143

53%

LEVEL 2

76

28%

LEVEL 3

28

10%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

14
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

71

71%

LEVEL 2

15

15%

LEVEL 3

8

8%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

19
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

62

53%

LEVEL 2

35

30%

LEVEL 3

14

12%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.