NORTH BRONX SCHOOL OF EMPOWERMENT GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

37
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 565

LEVEL 1

390

69%

LEVEL 2

138

24%

LEVEL 3

28

5%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

54
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 551

LEVEL 1

403

73%

LEVEL 2

94

17%

LEVEL 3

44

8%

LEVEL 4

10

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

21
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

159

62%

LEVEL 2

78

30%

LEVEL 3

14

5%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

28
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

171

68%

LEVEL 2

53

21%

LEVEL 3

24

10%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

16
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

231

75%

LEVEL 2

60

20%

LEVEL 3

14

5%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

26
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

232

78%

LEVEL 2

41

14%

LEVEL 3

20

7%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

7

50%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

14

70%

LEVEL 2

4

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

14

67%

LEVEL 2

2

10%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

8

67%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

8

67%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

22
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

228

70%

LEVEL 2

75

23%

LEVEL 3

16

5%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

34
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

231

74%

LEVEL 2

47

15%

LEVEL 3

30

10%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

133

69%

LEVEL 2

49

25%

LEVEL 3

11

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

145

74%

LEVEL 2

40

20%

LEVEL 3

9

5%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

36
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 440

LEVEL 1

278

63%

LEVEL 2

126

29%

LEVEL 3

28

6%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

49
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 420

LEVEL 1

286

68%

LEVEL 2

85

20%

LEVEL 3

40

10%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

112

90%

LEVEL 2

12

10%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

117

89%

LEVEL 2

9

7%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

37
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 480

LEVEL 1

311

65%

LEVEL 2

132

28%

LEVEL 3

28

6%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

54
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 475

LEVEL 1

331

70%

LEVEL 2

90

19%

LEVEL 3

44

9%

LEVEL 4

10

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

79

93%

LEVEL 2

6

7%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

72

95%

LEVEL 2

4

5%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

40

54%

LEVEL 2

27

36%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

47

71%

LEVEL 2

11

17%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 491

LEVEL 1

350

71%

LEVEL 2

111

23%

LEVEL 3

24

5%

LEVEL 4

6

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 485

LEVEL 1

356

73%

LEVEL 2

83

17%

LEVEL 3

38

8%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

35
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 481

LEVEL 1

332

69%

LEVEL 2

114

24%

LEVEL 3

26

5%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

47
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 457

LEVEL 1

333

73%

LEVEL 2

77

17%

LEVEL 3

38

8%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

58

69%

LEVEL 2

24

29%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

70

74%

LEVEL 2

17

18%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.