Skip to Content
Main content

SCHOOL OF INTEGRATED LEARNING GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

105
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

50

22%

LEVEL 2

75

33%

LEVEL 3

69

30%

LEVEL 4

36

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

158
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

66

23%

LEVEL 2

58

21%

LEVEL 3

64

23%

LEVEL 4

94

33%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

24

20%

LEVEL 2

36

30%

LEVEL 3

36

30%

LEVEL 4

23

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

97
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

31

20%

LEVEL 2

30

19%

LEVEL 3

36

23%

LEVEL 4

61

39%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

26

23%

LEVEL 2

39

35%

LEVEL 3

33

30%

LEVEL 4

13

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

35

28%

LEVEL 2

28

23%

LEVEL 3

28

23%

LEVEL 4

33

27%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

91
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

31

17%

LEVEL 2

59

33%

LEVEL 3

60

33%

LEVEL 4

31

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

132
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

42

19%

LEVEL 2

50

22%

LEVEL 3

53

24%

LEVEL 4

79

35%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

14

38%

LEVEL 2

10

27%

LEVEL 3

9

24%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

21

49%

LEVEL 2

5

12%

LEVEL 3

9

21%

LEVEL 4

8

19%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

102
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

34

18%

LEVEL 2

58

30%

LEVEL 3

66

34%

LEVEL 4

36

19%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

38

16%

LEVEL 2

53

22%

LEVEL 3

58

24%

LEVEL 4

93

38%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

16

44%

LEVEL 2

17

47%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

28

70%

LEVEL 2

5

13%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

104
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

37

18%

LEVEL 2

66

32%

LEVEL 3

68

33%

LEVEL 4

36

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

13

57%

LEVEL 2

9

39%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

3

19%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

5

31%

LEVEL 4

3

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

11

26%

LEVEL 3

10

23%

LEVEL 4

21

49%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

97
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

47

22%

LEVEL 2

70

33%

LEVEL 3

64

30%

LEVEL 4

33

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

127
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

65

27%

LEVEL 2

47

20%

LEVEL 3

54

23%

LEVEL 4

73

31%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

87
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

39

20%

LEVEL 2

65

34%

LEVEL 3

58

30%

LEVEL 4

29

15%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

146
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

55

22%

LEVEL 2

54

21%

LEVEL 3

60

24%

LEVEL 4

86

34%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

18
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

11

28%

LEVEL 2

10

26%

LEVEL 3

11

28%

LEVEL 4

7

18%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

11

41%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

8

30%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.