Skip to Content
Main content

KIPP ALBANY COMMUNITY CS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

150

36%

LEVEL 2

113

27%

LEVEL 3

96

23%

LEVEL 4

55

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

158
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

120

29%

LEVEL 2

129

32%

LEVEL 3

88

22%

LEVEL 4

70

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

75
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

73

37%

LEVEL 2

51

26%

LEVEL 3

48

24%

LEVEL 4

27

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

87
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

66

30%

LEVEL 2

69

31%

LEVEL 3

50

23%

LEVEL 4

37

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

76
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

77

36%

LEVEL 2

62

29%

LEVEL 3

48

22%

LEVEL 4

28

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

54

29%

LEVEL 2

60

32%

LEVEL 3

38

21%

LEVEL 4

33

18%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

142
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 386

LEVEL 1

142

37%

LEVEL 2

102

26%

LEVEL 3

91

24%

LEVEL 4

51

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

148
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

113

30%

LEVEL 2

115

31%

LEVEL 3

83

22%

LEVEL 4

65

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

7

39%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

7

29%

LEVEL 2

8

33%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

5

21%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 409

LEVEL 1

148

36%

LEVEL 2

110

27%

LEVEL 3

96

23%

LEVEL 4

55

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

158
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

118

29%

LEVEL 2

126

31%

LEVEL 3

88

22%

LEVEL 4

70

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

149
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

146

36%

LEVEL 2

112

28%

LEVEL 3

95

23%

LEVEL 4

54

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

157
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

117

29%

LEVEL 2

127

32%

LEVEL 3

87

22%

LEVEL 4

70

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

6

12%

LEVEL 2

14

29%

LEVEL 3

16

33%

LEVEL 4

13

27%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

12

19%

LEVEL 2

18

29%

LEVEL 3

20

32%

LEVEL 4

13

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

122
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

144

39%

LEVEL 2

99

27%

LEVEL 3

80

22%

LEVEL 4

42

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

125
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

108

31%

LEVEL 2

111

32%

LEVEL 3

68

20%

LEVEL 4

57

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

149
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

143

36%

LEVEL 2

110

27%

LEVEL 3

95

24%

LEVEL 4

54

13%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

155
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

114

29%

LEVEL 2

126

32%

LEVEL 3

86

22%

LEVEL 4

69

17%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

7

58%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

6

50%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.