LEADERSHIP PREP BEDFORD STUYVESANT GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

292
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

33

8%

LEVEL 2

85

21%

LEVEL 3

110

27%

LEVEL 4

182

44%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

350
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 447

LEVEL 1

30

7%

LEVEL 2

67

15%

LEVEL 3

148

33%

LEVEL 4

202

45%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

160
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

15

7%

LEVEL 2

40

19%

LEVEL 3

55

26%

LEVEL 4

105

49%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

190
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

38

16%

LEVEL 3

71

30%

LEVEL 4

119

50%

MALE

PROFICIENT

132
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

18

9%

LEVEL 2

45

23%

LEVEL 3

55

28%

LEVEL 4

77

39%

MALE

PROFICIENT

160
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

20

10%

LEVEL 2

29

14%

LEVEL 3

77

37%

LEVEL 4

83

40%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

4

67%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

249
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

27

8%

LEVEL 2

76

22%

LEVEL 3

96

27%

LEVEL 4

153

43%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

301
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

27

7%

LEVEL 2

57

15%

LEVEL 3

131

34%

LEVEL 4

170

44%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

24
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

6

17%

LEVEL 2

6

17%

LEVEL 3

9

25%

LEVEL 4

15

42%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

36
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

6

14%

LEVEL 3

13

30%

LEVEL 4

23

52%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

274
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

17

5%

LEVEL 2

69

19%

LEVEL 3

99

28%

LEVEL 4

175

49%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

323
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

13

3%

LEVEL 2

56

14%

LEVEL 3

129

33%

LEVEL 4

194

49%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

16

32%

LEVEL 2

16

32%

LEVEL 3

11

22%

LEVEL 4

7

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

27
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

17

31%

LEVEL 2

11

20%

LEVEL 3

19

35%

LEVEL 4

8

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

288
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

30

7%

LEVEL 2

85

21%

LEVEL 3

107

27%

LEVEL 4

181

45%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

341
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 436

LEVEL 1

30

7%

LEVEL 2

65

15%

LEVEL 3

142

33%

LEVEL 4

199

46%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

9
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

6

55%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

11

17%

LEVEL 3

12

18%

LEVEL 4

39

60%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

4

6%

LEVEL 2

7

10%

LEVEL 3

23

34%

LEVEL 4

33

49%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

241
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

30

9%

LEVEL 2

74

21%

LEVEL 3

98

28%

LEVEL 4

143

41%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

294
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

26

7%

LEVEL 2

60

16%

LEVEL 3

125

33%

LEVEL 4

169

44%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

268
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

31

8%

LEVEL 2

81

21%

LEVEL 3

104

27%

LEVEL 4

164

43%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

24
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

4

13%

LEVEL 3

6

20%

LEVEL 4

18

60%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.