Skip to Content
Main content

SUCCESS ACADEMY CHARTER-HARLEM 1 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

430
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 439

LEVEL 1

2

0%

LEVEL 2

7

2%

LEVEL 3

68

15%

LEVEL 4

362

82%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

404
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

8

2%

LEVEL 3

70

17%

LEVEL 4

334

80%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

209
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

28

13%

LEVEL 4

181

86%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

200
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

3

1%

LEVEL 3

32

16%

LEVEL 4

168

82%

MALE

PROFICIENT

221
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

3%

LEVEL 3

40

18%

LEVEL 4

181

79%

MALE

PROFICIENT

204
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

5

2%

LEVEL 3

38

18%

LEVEL 4

166

79%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

20
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

25%

LEVEL 4

15

75%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

14
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

6

43%

LEVEL 4

8

57%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

8

89%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

299
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

3

1%

LEVEL 3

51

17%

LEVEL 4

248

82%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

273
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

6

2%

LEVEL 3

45

16%

LEVEL 4

228

81%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

95
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

4

4%

LEVEL 3

10

10%

LEVEL 4

85

85%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

100
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

2

2%

LEVEL 3

18

17%

LEVEL 4

82

79%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

346
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

0%

LEVEL 3

38

11%

LEVEL 4

308

89%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

344
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

1%

LEVEL 3

42

12%

LEVEL 4

302

87%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

84
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

6

7%

LEVEL 3

30

33%

LEVEL 4

54

59%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

60
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

6

9%

LEVEL 3

28

41%

LEVEL 4

32

46%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

420
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 428

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

7

2%

LEVEL 3

66

15%

LEVEL 4

354

83%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

399
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

8

2%

LEVEL 3

68

17%

LEVEL 4

331

81%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

10
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

8

73%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

3

60%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

70

93%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

10

16%

LEVEL 4

51

82%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

356
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

7

2%

LEVEL 3

64

18%

LEVEL 4

292

80%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

343
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

8

2%

LEVEL 3

60

17%

LEVEL 4

283

80%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

393
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

2

0%

LEVEL 2

6

1%

LEVEL 3

62

15%

LEVEL 4

331

83%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

37
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

6

16%

LEVEL 4

31

82%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.