HYDE LEADERSHIP CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

159
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

87

24%

LEVEL 2

123

33%

LEVEL 3

107

29%

LEVEL 4

52

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

132
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

122

32%

LEVEL 2

128

34%

LEVEL 3

87

23%

LEVEL 4

45

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

93
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

33

19%

LEVEL 2

49

28%

LEVEL 3

63

36%

LEVEL 4

30

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

67
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

52

28%

LEVEL 2

69

37%

LEVEL 3

43

23%

LEVEL 4

24

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

66
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

54

28%

LEVEL 2

74

38%

LEVEL 3

44

23%

LEVEL 4

22

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

65
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

70

36%

LEVEL 2

59

30%

LEVEL 3

44

23%

LEVEL 4

21

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

45
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

25

21%

LEVEL 2

47

40%

LEVEL 3

29

25%

LEVEL 4

16

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

37
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

36

32%

LEVEL 2

38

34%

LEVEL 3

21

19%

LEVEL 4

16

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

111
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

62

25%

LEVEL 2

74

30%

LEVEL 3

75

30%

LEVEL 4

36

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

92
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

85

32%

LEVEL 2

89

33%

LEVEL 3

64

24%

LEVEL 4

28

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

146
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

48

17%

LEVEL 2

91

32%

LEVEL 3

99

35%

LEVEL 4

47

16%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

118
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

65

23%

LEVEL 2

99

35%

LEVEL 3

78

28%

LEVEL 4

40

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

39

46%

LEVEL 2

32

38%

LEVEL 3

8

10%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

57

57%

LEVEL 2

29

29%

LEVEL 3

9

9%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

151
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

67

21%

LEVEL 2

108

33%

LEVEL 3

101

31%

LEVEL 4

50

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

128
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

93

28%

LEVEL 2

117

35%

LEVEL 3

83

25%

LEVEL 4

45

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

8
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

20

47%

LEVEL 2

15

35%

LEVEL 3

6

14%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

29

66%

LEVEL 2

11

25%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

8

32%

LEVEL 3

12

48%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

9

25%

LEVEL 2

13

36%

LEVEL 3

10

28%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

144
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

85

25%

LEVEL 2

115

33%

LEVEL 3

95

28%

LEVEL 4

49

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

118
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

113

33%

LEVEL 2

115

33%

LEVEL 3

77

22%

LEVEL 4

41

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

140
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

70

22%

LEVEL 2

105

33%

LEVEL 3

96

30%

LEVEL 4

44

14%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

19
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

17

31%

LEVEL 2

18

33%

LEVEL 3

11

20%

LEVEL 4

8

15%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.