Skip to Content
Main content

ACHIEVEMENT FIRST BUSHWICK CS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

517
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 582

LEVEL 1

18

3%

LEVEL 2

47

8%

LEVEL 3

152

26%

LEVEL 4

365

63%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

522
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 602

LEVEL 1

25

4%

LEVEL 2

55

9%

LEVEL 3

153

25%

LEVEL 4

369

61%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

253
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

20

7%

LEVEL 3

74

27%

LEVEL 4

179

64%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

252
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

25

9%

LEVEL 3

76

26%

LEVEL 4

176

61%

MALE

PROFICIENT

264
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

13

4%

LEVEL 2

27

9%

LEVEL 3

78

26%

LEVEL 4

186

61%

MALE

PROFICIENT

270
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

14

4%

LEVEL 2

30

10%

LEVEL 3

77

25%

LEVEL 4

193

61%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

6

86%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

7
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

5

71%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

140
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

10

6%

LEVEL 2

16

10%

LEVEL 3

48

29%

LEVEL 4

92

55%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

131
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

13

8%

LEVEL 2

24

14%

LEVEL 3

39

23%

LEVEL 4

92

55%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

366
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 404

LEVEL 1

8

2%

LEVEL 2

30

7%

LEVEL 3

102

25%

LEVEL 4

264

65%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

377
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 420

LEVEL 1

12

3%

LEVEL 2

31

7%

LEVEL 3

112

27%

LEVEL 4

265

63%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

438
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 464

LEVEL 1

5

1%

LEVEL 2

21

5%

LEVEL 3

111

24%

LEVEL 4

327

70%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

432
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 463

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

28

6%

LEVEL 3

116

25%

LEVEL 4

316

68%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

79
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

13

11%

LEVEL 2

26

22%

LEVEL 3

41

35%

LEVEL 4

38

32%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

90
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

22

16%

LEVEL 2

27

19%

LEVEL 3

37

27%

LEVEL 4

53

38%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

470
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 529

LEVEL 1

17

3%

LEVEL 2

42

8%

LEVEL 3

135

26%

LEVEL 4

335

63%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

487
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 557

LEVEL 1

20

4%

LEVEL 2

50

9%

LEVEL 3

139

25%

LEVEL 4

348

62%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

47
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

5

9%

LEVEL 3

17

32%

LEVEL 4

30

57%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

35
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

5

11%

LEVEL 2

5

11%

LEVEL 3

14

31%

LEVEL 4

21

47%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

3

4%

LEVEL 3

16

23%

LEVEL 4

51

72%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

76
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

2

3%

LEVEL 3

21

27%

LEVEL 4

55

70%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

450
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 511

LEVEL 1

17

3%

LEVEL 2

44

9%

LEVEL 3

136

27%

LEVEL 4

314

61%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

446
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 523

LEVEL 1

24

5%

LEVEL 2

53

10%

LEVEL 3

132

25%

LEVEL 4

314

60%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

499
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 562

LEVEL 1

18

3%

LEVEL 2

45

8%

LEVEL 3

147

26%

LEVEL 4

352

63%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

18
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

10%

LEVEL 3

5

25%

LEVEL 4

13

65%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.