ACADEMY FOR YOUNG WRITERS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

30
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

124

62%

LEVEL 2

45

23%

LEVEL 3

23

12%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

36
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

107

53%

LEVEL 2

58

29%

LEVEL 3

28

14%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

17
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

74

61%

LEVEL 2

30

25%

LEVEL 3

12

10%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

19
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

65

54%

LEVEL 2

37

31%

LEVEL 3

14

12%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

13
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

50

64%

LEVEL 2

15

19%

LEVEL 3

11

14%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

17
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

42

53%

LEVEL 2

21

26%

LEVEL 3

14

18%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

88

67%

LEVEL 2

27

21%

LEVEL 3

13

10%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

18
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

77

57%

LEVEL 2

39

29%

LEVEL 3

15

11%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

35

56%

LEVEL 2

15

24%

LEVEL 3

9

15%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

27

45%

LEVEL 2

19

32%

LEVEL 3

9

15%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

30
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

92

56%

LEVEL 2

42

26%

LEVEL 3

23

14%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

35
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

64

42%

LEVEL 2

54

35%

LEVEL 3

27

18%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

32

91%

LEVEL 2

3

9%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

43

90%

LEVEL 2

4

8%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

30
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

117

61%

LEVEL 2

44

23%

LEVEL 3

23

12%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

7

88%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

12

50%

LEVEL 2

6

25%

LEVEL 3

6

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

12

43%

LEVEL 2

9

32%

LEVEL 3

4

14%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

112

64%

LEVEL 2

39

22%

LEVEL 3

17

10%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

95

55%

LEVEL 2

49

28%

LEVEL 3

24

14%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

27
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

112

63%

LEVEL 2

39

22%

LEVEL 3

22

12%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

34
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

93

51%

LEVEL 2

56

31%

LEVEL 3

27

15%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

12

57%

LEVEL 2

6

29%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

14

78%

LEVEL 2

2

11%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.