BRONX EARLY COL ACAD-TEACH/LEARN GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

32
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

118

53%

LEVEL 2

71

32%

LEVEL 3

25

11%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

25
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

57

49%

LEVEL 2

35

30%

LEVEL 3

14

12%

LEVEL 4

11

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

13
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

57

50%

LEVEL 2

43

38%

LEVEL 3

9

8%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

13
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

36

52%

LEVEL 2

20

29%

LEVEL 3

8

12%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

19
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

61

56%

LEVEL 2

28

26%

LEVEL 3

16

15%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

12
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

21

44%

LEVEL 2

15

31%

LEVEL 3

6

13%

LEVEL 4

6

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

84

54%

LEVEL 2

52

33%

LEVEL 3

14

9%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

33

44%

LEVEL 2

23

31%

LEVEL 3

12

16%

LEVEL 4

7

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

31
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

87

47%

LEVEL 2

69

37%

LEVEL 3

24

13%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

24
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

38

42%

LEVEL 2

29

32%

LEVEL 3

14

15%

LEVEL 4

10

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

31

91%

LEVEL 2

2

6%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

19

73%

LEVEL 2

6

23%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

32
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

97

49%

LEVEL 2

67

34%

LEVEL 3

25

13%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

24
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

49

47%

LEVEL 2

32

30%

LEVEL 3

13

12%

LEVEL 4

11

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

21

84%

LEVEL 2

4

16%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

8

67%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

113

54%

LEVEL 2

67

32%

LEVEL 3

22

11%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

56

51%

LEVEL 2

32

29%

LEVEL 3

14

13%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

28
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

97

52%

LEVEL 2

60

32%

LEVEL 3

23

12%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

19
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

46

47%

LEVEL 2

32

33%

LEVEL 3

9

9%

LEVEL 4

10

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

21

58%

LEVEL 2

11

31%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

11

55%

LEVEL 2

3

15%

LEVEL 3

5

25%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.