Skip to Content
Main content

BRONX GREEN MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

59
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

198

62%

LEVEL 2

61

19%

LEVEL 3

38

12%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

83
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

202

52%

LEVEL 2

102

26%

LEVEL 3

54

14%

LEVEL 4

29

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

29
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

96

64%

LEVEL 2

26

17%

LEVEL 3

18

12%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

100

52%

LEVEL 2

49

25%

LEVEL 3

26

13%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

30
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

102

61%

LEVEL 2

35

21%

LEVEL 3

20

12%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

39
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

102

53%

LEVEL 2

53

27%

LEVEL 3

28

14%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

13
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

9

36%

LEVEL 2

3

12%

LEVEL 3

6

24%

LEVEL 4

7

28%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

12
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

24

59%

LEVEL 2

5

12%

LEVEL 3

5

12%

LEVEL 4

7

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

19
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

25

43%

LEVEL 2

14

24%

LEVEL 3

9

16%

LEVEL 4

10

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

49

69%

LEVEL 2

16

23%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

46

66%

LEVEL 2

15

21%

LEVEL 3

8

11%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

114

63%

LEVEL 2

36

20%

LEVEL 3

25

14%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

39
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

121

53%

LEVEL 2

68

30%

LEVEL 3

28

12%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

56
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

128

53%

LEVEL 2

57

24%

LEVEL 3

35

15%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

81
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

129

42%

LEVEL 2

95

31%

LEVEL 3

53

17%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

70

91%

LEVEL 2

4

5%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

73

89%

LEVEL 2

7

9%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

57
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

144

57%

LEVEL 2

52

21%

LEVEL 3

36

14%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

81
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

144

47%

LEVEL 2

84

27%

LEVEL 3

52

17%

LEVEL 4

29

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

54

83%

LEVEL 2

9

14%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

58

74%

LEVEL 2

18

23%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

9

53%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

3

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

11

37%

LEVEL 2

6

20%

LEVEL 3

8

27%

LEVEL 4

5

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

189

63%

LEVEL 2

57

19%

LEVEL 3

37

12%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

191

54%

LEVEL 2

96

27%

LEVEL 3

46

13%

LEVEL 4

24

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

53
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

181

63%

LEVEL 2

55

19%

LEVEL 3

34

12%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

74
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

175

52%

LEVEL 2

88

26%

LEVEL 3

47

14%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

17

59%

LEVEL 2

6

21%

LEVEL 3

4

14%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

27

54%

LEVEL 2

14

28%

LEVEL 3

7

14%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.