WASHINGTON HGTS EXPEDITIONARY LEARN GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

22
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

130

55%

LEVEL 2

86

36%

LEVEL 3

17

7%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

87
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

56

24%

LEVEL 2

87

38%

LEVEL 3

62

27%

LEVEL 4

25

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

9
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

65

57%

LEVEL 2

41

36%

LEVEL 3

8

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

36
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

22

24%

LEVEL 2

35

38%

LEVEL 3

27

29%

LEVEL 4

9

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

13
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

65

53%

LEVEL 2

45

37%

LEVEL 3

9

7%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

34

25%

LEVEL 2

52

38%

LEVEL 3

35

26%

LEVEL 4

16

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

123

56%

LEVEL 2

80

37%

LEVEL 3

15

7%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

78
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

54

25%

LEVEL 2

85

39%

LEVEL 3

58

27%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

21
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

89

48%

LEVEL 2

75

41%

LEVEL 3

17

9%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

32

18%

LEVEL 2

71

39%

LEVEL 3

56

31%

LEVEL 4

23

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

41

77%

LEVEL 2

11

21%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

24

50%

LEVEL 2

16

33%

LEVEL 3

6

13%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

22
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

93

49%

LEVEL 2

76

40%

LEVEL 3

17

9%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

80
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

21

12%

LEVEL 2

72

42%

LEVEL 3

55

32%

LEVEL 4

25

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

37

79%

LEVEL 2

10

21%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

7
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

35

61%

LEVEL 2

15

26%

LEVEL 3

7

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

14

39%

LEVEL 2

14

39%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

5

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

7

18%

LEVEL 2

12

31%

LEVEL 3

10

26%

LEVEL 4

10

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

116

57%

LEVEL 2

72

36%

LEVEL 3

14

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

49

26%

LEVEL 2

75

39%

LEVEL 3

52

27%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

22
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

110

52%

LEVEL 2

80

38%

LEVEL 3

17

8%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

77
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

47

23%

LEVEL 2

79

39%

LEVEL 3

54

27%

LEVEL 4

23

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

20

77%

LEVEL 2

6

23%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

9

33%

LEVEL 2

8

30%

LEVEL 3

8

30%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.