Skip to Content
Main content

FELIX FESTA CHARACTER MS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

165
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

38

13%

LEVEL 2

84

29%

LEVEL 3

100

35%

LEVEL 4

65

23%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

34

11%

LEVEL 2

103

33%

LEVEL 3

99

32%

LEVEL 4

77

25%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

71
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

11

9%

LEVEL 2

42

34%

LEVEL 3

39

31%

LEVEL 4

32

26%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

87
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

21

14%

LEVEL 2

43

28%

LEVEL 3

45

30%

LEVEL 4

42

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

94
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

27

17%

LEVEL 2

42

26%

LEVEL 3

61

37%

LEVEL 4

33

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

89
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

13

8%

LEVEL 2

60

37%

LEVEL 3

54

33%

LEVEL 4

35

22%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

5

45%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

39
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

6

10%

LEVEL 2

16

26%

LEVEL 3

20

33%

LEVEL 4

19

31%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

47
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

8

11%

LEVEL 2

16

23%

LEVEL 3

18

25%

LEVEL 4

29

41%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

90
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

12

9%

LEVEL 2

38

27%

LEVEL 3

59

42%

LEVEL 4

31

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

92
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

10

7%

LEVEL 2

41

29%

LEVEL 3

58

41%

LEVEL 4

34

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

6

24%

LEVEL 2

11

44%

LEVEL 3

4

16%

LEVEL 4

4

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

3

18%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

7

41%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

14

28%

LEVEL 2

17

34%

LEVEL 3

13

26%

LEVEL 4

6

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

12

16%

LEVEL 2

36

49%

LEVEL 3

14

19%

LEVEL 4

11

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

161
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

20

8%

LEVEL 2

76

30%

LEVEL 3

96

37%

LEVEL 4

65

25%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

168
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

19

7%

LEVEL 2

87

32%

LEVEL 3

93

34%

LEVEL 4

75

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

18

60%

LEVEL 2

8

27%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

15

38%

LEVEL 2

16

41%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

161
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

31

11%

LEVEL 2

84

30%

LEVEL 3

97

35%

LEVEL 4

64

23%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

175
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

25

8%

LEVEL 2

99

33%

LEVEL 3

98

33%

LEVEL 4

77

26%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

7

64%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

9

64%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

142
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

25

11%

LEVEL 2

71

30%

LEVEL 3

85

36%

LEVEL 4

57

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

156
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

20

8%

LEVEL 2

79

31%

LEVEL 3

87

34%

LEVEL 4

69

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

13

27%

LEVEL 2

13

27%

LEVEL 3

15

31%

LEVEL 4

8

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

14

24%

LEVEL 2

24

41%

LEVEL 3

12

21%

LEVEL 4

8

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.