AMPARK NEIGHBORHOOD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

44

24%

LEVEL 2

50

27%

LEVEL 3

56

31%

LEVEL 4

33

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

36

21%

LEVEL 2

44

26%

LEVEL 3

61

36%

LEVEL 4

29

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

40
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

24

26%

LEVEL 2

27

30%

LEVEL 3

23

25%

LEVEL 4

17

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

40
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

16

21%

LEVEL 2

22

28%

LEVEL 3

28

36%

LEVEL 4

12

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

49
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

20

22%

LEVEL 2

23

25%

LEVEL 3

33

36%

LEVEL 4

16

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

20

22%

LEVEL 2

22

24%

LEVEL 3

33

36%

LEVEL 4

17

18%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

4

44%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

4

57%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

20
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

3

10%

LEVEL 2

6

21%

LEVEL 3

12

41%

LEVEL 4

8

28%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

17
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

5

19%

LEVEL 2

5

19%

LEVEL 3

11

41%

LEVEL 4

6

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

11

42%

LEVEL 2

8

31%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

4

21%

LEVEL 2

9

47%

LEVEL 3

5

26%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

51
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

29

25%

LEVEL 2

34

30%

LEVEL 3

32

28%

LEVEL 4

19

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

57
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

26

24%

LEVEL 2

27

25%

LEVEL 3

41

37%

LEVEL 4

16

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

81
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

32

21%

LEVEL 2

40

26%

LEVEL 3

49

32%

LEVEL 4

32

21%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

83
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

21

16%

LEVEL 2

31

23%

LEVEL 3

54

40%

LEVEL 4

29

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

12

40%

LEVEL 2

10

33%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

15

43%

LEVEL 2

13

37%

LEVEL 3

7

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

85
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

39

22%

LEVEL 2

50

29%

LEVEL 3

52

30%

LEVEL 4

33

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

87
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

33

20%

LEVEL 2

44

27%

LEVEL 3

59

36%

LEVEL 4

28

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

12

14%

LEVEL 2

20

23%

LEVEL 3

32

37%

LEVEL 4

22

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

8

10%

LEVEL 2

23

28%

LEVEL 3

32

40%

LEVEL 4

18

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

32

33%

LEVEL 2

30

31%

LEVEL 3

24

25%

LEVEL 4

11

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

28

31%

LEVEL 2

21

24%

LEVEL 3

29

33%

LEVEL 4

11

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

85
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

34

21%

LEVEL 2

46

28%

LEVEL 3

54

33%

LEVEL 4

31

19%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

82
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

35

22%

LEVEL 2

44

27%

LEVEL 3

54

34%

LEVEL 4

28

17%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

10

56%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

8
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

7

78%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.