LEADERS OF TOMORROW GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

53
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

199

55%

LEVEL 2

113

31%

LEVEL 3

40

11%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

34
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

268

68%

LEVEL 2

92

23%

LEVEL 3

30

8%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

26
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

78

50%

LEVEL 2

51

33%

LEVEL 3

18

12%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

15
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

118

64%

LEVEL 2

51

28%

LEVEL 3

13

7%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

27
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

121

58%

LEVEL 2

62

30%

LEVEL 3

22

10%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

19
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

150

71%

LEVEL 2

41

20%

LEVEL 3

17

8%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

6

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

30
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

118

56%

LEVEL 2

61

29%

LEVEL 3

22

11%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

22
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

154

65%

LEVEL 2

60

25%

LEVEL 3

21

9%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

71

55%

LEVEL 2

41

32%

LEVEL 3

13

10%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

103

72%

LEVEL 2

29

20%

LEVEL 3

8

6%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

50
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

117

45%

LEVEL 2

95

36%

LEVEL 3

38

15%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

34
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

175

60%

LEVEL 2

81

28%

LEVEL 3

30

10%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

82

80%

LEVEL 2

18

17%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

93

89%

LEVEL 2

11

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

53
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

166

52%

LEVEL 2

98

31%

LEVEL 3

40

13%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

34
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

214

64%

LEVEL 2

86

26%

LEVEL 3

30

9%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

33

69%

LEVEL 2

15

31%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

54

90%

LEVEL 2

6

10%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

9

50%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

5

28%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

18

46%

LEVEL 2

14

36%

LEVEL 3

5

13%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

190

55%

LEVEL 2

109

31%

LEVEL 3

35

10%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

250

70%

LEVEL 2

78

22%

LEVEL 3

25

7%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

47
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

175

54%

LEVEL 2

103

32%

LEVEL 3

36

11%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

32
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

228

66%

LEVEL 2

86

25%

LEVEL 3

28

8%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

24

60%

LEVEL 2

10

25%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

40

83%

LEVEL 2

6

13%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.