URBAN ASSEMBLY SCH-CRIMINAL JUSTICE GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

70
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

32

18%

LEVEL 2

76

43%

LEVEL 3

60

34%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

23

12%

LEVEL 2

59

32%

LEVEL 3

71

38%

LEVEL 4

33

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

29
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

14

18%

LEVEL 2

33

43%

LEVEL 3

26

34%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

48
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

9

10%

LEVEL 2

30

34%

LEVEL 3

30

34%

LEVEL 4

18

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

9
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

4

17%

LEVEL 2

11

46%

LEVEL 3

7

29%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

16
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

8

31%

LEVEL 3

10

38%

LEVEL 4

6

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

5

19%

LEVEL 2

11

42%

LEVEL 3

8

31%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

8

17%

LEVEL 2

19

41%

LEVEL 3

16

35%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

26
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

10

22%

LEVEL 2

10

22%

LEVEL 3

21

46%

LEVEL 4

5

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

70
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

26

16%

LEVEL 2

70

42%

LEVEL 3

60

36%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

101
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

17

10%

LEVEL 2

58

33%

LEVEL 3

68

39%

LEVEL 4

33

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

6

50%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

6

60%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

66
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

21

14%

LEVEL 2

60

41%

LEVEL 3

56

38%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

98
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

11

7%

LEVEL 2

50

31%

LEVEL 3

65

41%

LEVEL 4

33

21%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

11

35%

LEVEL 2

16

52%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

12

44%

LEVEL 2

9

33%

LEVEL 3

6

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

2

12%

LEVEL 2

5

29%

LEVEL 3

7

41%

LEVEL 4

3

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

30

18%

LEVEL 2

73

43%

LEVEL 3

58

34%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

94
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

21

12%

LEVEL 2

54

32%

LEVEL 3

64

38%

LEVEL 4

30

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

63
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

28

17%

LEVEL 2

72

44%

LEVEL 3

53

33%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

97
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

18

11%

LEVEL 2

52

31%

LEVEL 3

67

40%

LEVEL 4

30

18%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

4

27%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

7

47%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

5

26%

LEVEL 2

7

37%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

3

16%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.