URBAN INSTITUTE OF MATHEMATICS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

86
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

115

35%

LEVEL 2

124

38%

LEVEL 3

63

19%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

157
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

108

30%

LEVEL 2

92

26%

LEVEL 3

96

27%

LEVEL 4

61

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

48
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

49

32%

LEVEL 2

54

36%

LEVEL 3

32

21%

LEVEL 4

16

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

77
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

47

29%

LEVEL 2

39

24%

LEVEL 3

42

26%

LEVEL 4

35

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

66

38%

LEVEL 2

70

40%

LEVEL 3

31

18%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

80
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

61

31%

LEVEL 2

53

27%

LEVEL 3

54

28%

LEVEL 4

26

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

6

50%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

19
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

9

18%

LEVEL 2

21

43%

LEVEL 3

11

22%

LEVEL 4

8

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

27
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

12

22%

LEVEL 2

16

29%

LEVEL 3

16

29%

LEVEL 4

11

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

16

39%

LEVEL 2

14

34%

LEVEL 3

11

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

22
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

16

36%

LEVEL 2

7

16%

LEVEL 3

13

29%

LEVEL 4

9

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

47
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

84

39%

LEVEL 2

86

40%

LEVEL 3

34

16%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

96
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

78

32%

LEVEL 2

67

28%

LEVEL 3

61

25%

LEVEL 4

35

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

83
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

73

27%

LEVEL 2

114

42%

LEVEL 3

60

22%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

62

21%

LEVEL 2

79

27%

LEVEL 3

91

31%

LEVEL 4

60

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

42

76%

LEVEL 2

10

18%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

46

71%

LEVEL 2

13

20%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

82
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

104

35%

LEVEL 2

115

38%

LEVEL 3

59

20%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

154
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

94

28%

LEVEL 2

90

27%

LEVEL 3

93

28%

LEVEL 4

61

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

11

46%

LEVEL 2

9

38%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

14

74%

LEVEL 2

2

11%

LEVEL 3

3

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

12

16%

LEVEL 2

23

32%

LEVEL 3

26

36%

LEVEL 4

12

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

22

22%

LEVEL 2

30

29%

LEVEL 3

31

30%

LEVEL 4

19

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

103

41%

LEVEL 2

101

40%

LEVEL 3

37

15%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

107
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

86

34%

LEVEL 2

62

24%

LEVEL 3

65

25%

LEVEL 4

42

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

78
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

107

36%

LEVEL 2

116

39%

LEVEL 3

56

19%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

148
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

95

29%

LEVEL 2

89

27%

LEVEL 3

90

27%

LEVEL 4

58

17%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

8
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

8

33%

LEVEL 2

8

33%

LEVEL 3

7

29%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

13

52%

LEVEL 2

3

12%

LEVEL 3

6

24%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.