GASKILL PREPARATORY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

38
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

245

63%

LEVEL 2

107

27%

LEVEL 3

30

8%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

53
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

220

56%

LEVEL 2

118

30%

LEVEL 3

46

12%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

14
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

115

60%

LEVEL 2

63

33%

LEVEL 3

12

6%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

27
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

105

54%

LEVEL 2

61

32%

LEVEL 3

23

12%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

24
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

130

66%

LEVEL 2

44

22%

LEVEL 3

18

9%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

26
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

115

58%

LEVEL 2

57

29%

LEVEL 3

23

12%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

37

74%

LEVEL 2

9

18%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

42

61%

LEVEL 2

20

29%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

15

83%

LEVEL 2

3

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

21
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

46

46%

LEVEL 2

34

34%

LEVEL 3

16

16%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

20
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

56

49%

LEVEL 2

38

33%

LEVEL 3

18

16%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

129

69%

LEVEL 2

50

27%

LEVEL 3

8

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

102

64%

LEVEL 2

43

27%

LEVEL 3

13

8%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

17

61%

LEVEL 2

10

36%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

12

39%

LEVEL 2

11

35%

LEVEL 3

8

26%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

38
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

188

58%

LEVEL 2

97

30%

LEVEL 3

30

9%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

53
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

161

50%

LEVEL 2

109

34%

LEVEL 3

46

14%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

57

85%

LEVEL 2

10

15%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

59

87%

LEVEL 2

9

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

19

35%

LEVEL 2

20

37%

LEVEL 3

12

22%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

16

37%

LEVEL 2

14

33%

LEVEL 3

11

26%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

226

67%

LEVEL 2

87

26%

LEVEL 3

18

5%

LEVEL 4

5

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

204

59%

LEVEL 2

104

30%

LEVEL 3

35

10%

LEVEL 4

5

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

36
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

242

63%

LEVEL 2

107

28%

LEVEL 3

28

7%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

51
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

215

57%

LEVEL 2

113

30%

LEVEL 3

45

12%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.