Skip to Content
Main content

ACHIEVEMENT FIRST BROWNSVILLE CS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

351
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 529

LEVEL 1

55

10%

LEVEL 2

123

23%

LEVEL 3

167

32%

LEVEL 4

184

35%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

398
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 527

LEVEL 1

21

4%

LEVEL 2

108

20%

LEVEL 3

171

32%

LEVEL 4

227

43%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

208
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

28

9%

LEVEL 2

70

23%

LEVEL 3

94

31%

LEVEL 4

114

37%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

228
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

57

20%

LEVEL 3

93

32%

LEVEL 4

135

47%

MALE

PROFICIENT

143
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

27

12%

LEVEL 2

53

24%

LEVEL 3

73

33%

LEVEL 4

70

31%

MALE

PROFICIENT

170
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

16

7%

LEVEL 2

51

22%

LEVEL 3

78

33%

LEVEL 4

92

39%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

298
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 448

LEVEL 1

44

10%

LEVEL 2

106

24%

LEVEL 3

139

31%

LEVEL 4

159

35%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

343
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 448

LEVEL 1

15

3%

LEVEL 2

90

20%

LEVEL 3

151

34%

LEVEL 4

192

43%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

45
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

10

14%

LEVEL 2

15

21%

LEVEL 3

23

33%

LEVEL 4

22

31%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

49
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

5

7%

LEVEL 2

18

25%

LEVEL 3

18

25%

LEVEL 4

31

43%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

328
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 455

LEVEL 1

32

7%

LEVEL 2

95

21%

LEVEL 3

153

34%

LEVEL 4

175

38%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

370
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 454

LEVEL 1

9

2%

LEVEL 2

75

17%

LEVEL 3

151

33%

LEVEL 4

219

48%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

23
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

23

31%

LEVEL 2

28

38%

LEVEL 3

14

19%

LEVEL 4

9

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

28
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

12

16%

LEVEL 2

33

45%

LEVEL 3

20

27%

LEVEL 4

8

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

346
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 517

LEVEL 1

55

11%

LEVEL 2

116

22%

LEVEL 3

165

32%

LEVEL 4

181

35%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

388
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 513

LEVEL 1

19

4%

LEVEL 2

106

21%

LEVEL 3

164

32%

LEVEL 4

224

44%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

58%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

3

25%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

7

50%

LEVEL 4

3

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

4

5%

LEVEL 2

14

19%

LEVEL 3

28

38%

LEVEL 4

28

38%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

4

4%

LEVEL 2

23

22%

LEVEL 3

29

28%

LEVEL 4

48

46%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

295
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 455

LEVEL 1

51

11%

LEVEL 2

109

24%

LEVEL 3

139

31%

LEVEL 4

156

34%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

321
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 423

LEVEL 1

17

4%

LEVEL 2

85

20%

LEVEL 3

142

34%

LEVEL 4

179

42%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

332
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 497

LEVEL 1

51

10%

LEVEL 2

114

23%

LEVEL 3

159

32%

LEVEL 4

173

35%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

19
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

4

13%

LEVEL 2

9

28%

LEVEL 3

8

25%

LEVEL 4

11

34%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.