BRONX COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

122

37%

LEVEL 2

128

38%

LEVEL 3

64

19%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

114
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

100

30%

LEVEL 2

119

36%

LEVEL 3

80

24%

LEVEL 4

34

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

43
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

59

35%

LEVEL 2

69

40%

LEVEL 3

36

21%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

57
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

45

27%

LEVEL 2

64

39%

LEVEL 3

41

25%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

41
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

63

39%

LEVEL 2

59

36%

LEVEL 3

28

17%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

57
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

55

33%

LEVEL 2

55

33%

LEVEL 3

39

23%

LEVEL 4

18

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

5

42%

LEVEL 4

3

25%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

9
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

5

50%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

40

44%

LEVEL 2

36

40%

LEVEL 3

13

14%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

24
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

32

37%

LEVEL 2

31

36%

LEVEL 3

21

24%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

51
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

78

36%

LEVEL 2

88

41%

LEVEL 3

40

18%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

73
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

65

29%

LEVEL 2

85

38%

LEVEL 3

51

23%

LEVEL 4

22

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

76

28%

LEVEL 2

118

44%

LEVEL 3

60

22%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

103
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

59

23%

LEVEL 2

97

37%

LEVEL 3

75

29%

LEVEL 4

28

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

46

73%

LEVEL 2

10

16%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

41

55%

LEVEL 2

22

30%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

74
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

99

35%

LEVEL 2

111

39%

LEVEL 3

55

19%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

103
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

82

29%

LEVEL 2

100

35%

LEVEL 3

72

25%

LEVEL 4

31

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

10
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

23

46%

LEVEL 2

17

34%

LEVEL 3

9

18%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

11
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

18

38%

LEVEL 2

19

40%

LEVEL 3

8

17%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

12

24%

LEVEL 2

14

29%

LEVEL 3

13

27%

LEVEL 4

10

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

9

24%

LEVEL 2

7

18%

LEVEL 3

13

34%

LEVEL 4

9

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

110

39%

LEVEL 2

114

40%

LEVEL 3

51

18%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

92
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

91

31%

LEVEL 2

112

38%

LEVEL 3

67

23%

LEVEL 4

25

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

79
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

115

37%

LEVEL 2

121

38%

LEVEL 3

60

19%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

7

37%

LEVEL 2

7

37%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.