Skip to Content
Main content

BROOKLYN ASCEND CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

425
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 602

LEVEL 1

64

11%

LEVEL 2

113

19%

LEVEL 3

166

28%

LEVEL 4

259

43%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

454
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 609

LEVEL 1

59

10%

LEVEL 2

96

16%

LEVEL 3

176

29%

LEVEL 4

278

46%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

221
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

26

9%

LEVEL 2

47

16%

LEVEL 3

84

29%

LEVEL 4

137

47%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

229
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

28

9%

LEVEL 2

45

15%

LEVEL 3

85

28%

LEVEL 4

144

48%

MALE

PROFICIENT

204
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

38

12%

LEVEL 2

66

21%

LEVEL 3

82

27%

LEVEL 4

122

40%

MALE

PROFICIENT

225
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

31

10%

LEVEL 2

51

17%

LEVEL 3

91

30%

LEVEL 4

134

44%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

7
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

5

63%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

4

80%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

403
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 571

LEVEL 1

62

11%

LEVEL 2

106

19%

LEVEL 3

159

28%

LEVEL 4

244

43%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

428
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 572

LEVEL 1

56

10%

LEVEL 2

88

15%

LEVEL 3

166

29%

LEVEL 4

262

46%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

6

40%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

3

16%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

7

37%

LEVEL 4

4

21%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

395
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 508

LEVEL 1

27

5%

LEVEL 2

86

17%

LEVEL 3

144

28%

LEVEL 4

251

49%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

419
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 523

LEVEL 1

31

6%

LEVEL 2

73

14%

LEVEL 3

157

30%

LEVEL 4

262

50%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

30
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

37

39%

LEVEL 2

27

29%

LEVEL 3

22

23%

LEVEL 4

8

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

35
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

28

33%

LEVEL 2

23

27%

LEVEL 3

19

22%

LEVEL 4

16

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

421
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 595

LEVEL 1

64

11%

LEVEL 2

110

18%

LEVEL 3

165

28%

LEVEL 4

256

43%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

452
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 604

LEVEL 1

59

10%

LEVEL 2

93

15%

LEVEL 3

175

29%

LEVEL 4

277

46%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

5

5%

LEVEL 2

18

19%

LEVEL 3

23

24%

LEVEL 4

48

51%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

94
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

7

6%

LEVEL 2

16

14%

LEVEL 3

29

25%

LEVEL 4

65

56%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

354
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 508

LEVEL 1

59

12%

LEVEL 2

95

19%

LEVEL 3

143

28%

LEVEL 4

211

42%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

360
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 492

LEVEL 1

52

11%

LEVEL 2

80

16%

LEVEL 3

147

30%

LEVEL 4

213

43%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

401
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 563

LEVEL 1

57

10%

LEVEL 2

105

19%

LEVEL 3

156

28%

LEVEL 4

245

44%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

24
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

7

18%

LEVEL 2

8

21%

LEVEL 3

10

26%

LEVEL 4

14

36%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.