SUCCESS ACAD CHARTER SCH-HARLEM 3 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

451
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 465

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

10

2%

LEVEL 3

64

14%

LEVEL 4

387

83%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

512
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 515

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

2

0%

LEVEL 3

30

6%

LEVEL 4

482

94%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

233
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

5

2%

LEVEL 3

28

12%

LEVEL 4

205

86%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

258
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

11

4%

LEVEL 4

247

96%

MALE

PROFICIENT

218
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

5

2%

LEVEL 3

36

16%

LEVEL 4

182

81%

MALE

PROFICIENT

254
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

2

1%

LEVEL 3

19

7%

LEVEL 4

235

91%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

6

86%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

12
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

10

77%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

10
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

9

82%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

278
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

6

2%

LEVEL 3

42

15%

LEVEL 4

236

82%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

296
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

0%

LEVEL 3

24

8%

LEVEL 4

272

92%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

139
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

3

2%

LEVEL 3

19

13%

LEVEL 4

120

84%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

180
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

3%

LEVEL 4

175

97%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

338
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

0%

LEVEL 3

27

8%

LEVEL 4

311

92%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

389
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

11

3%

LEVEL 4

378

97%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

113
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

9

7%

LEVEL 3

37

29%

LEVEL 4

76

60%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

123
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

2

2%

LEVEL 3

19

15%

LEVEL 4

104

83%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

443
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 455

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

9

2%

LEVEL 3

62

14%

LEVEL 4

381

84%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

506
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 509

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

2

0%

LEVEL 3

29

6%

LEVEL 4

477

94%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

8
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

6

60%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

5

83%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

7

10%

LEVEL 4

66

90%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

113
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

8

7%

LEVEL 4

105

93%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

378
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

10

3%

LEVEL 3

57

15%

LEVEL 4

321

82%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

399
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

2

0%

LEVEL 3

22

5%

LEVEL 4

377

94%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

410
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 424

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

10

2%

LEVEL 3

56

13%

LEVEL 4

354

83%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

41
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

8

20%

LEVEL 4

33

80%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.