Skip to Content
Main content

PAVE ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

63

20%

LEVEL 2

65

21%

LEVEL 3

99

32%

LEVEL 4

81

26%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

172
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

53

17%

LEVEL 2

85

27%

LEVEL 3

95

31%

LEVEL 4

77

25%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

90
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

35

22%

LEVEL 2

36

22%

LEVEL 3

52

32%

LEVEL 4

38

24%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

90
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

29

17%

LEVEL 2

52

30%

LEVEL 3

50

29%

LEVEL 4

40

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

90
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

28

19%

LEVEL 2

29

20%

LEVEL 3

47

32%

LEVEL 4

43

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

82
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

24

17%

LEVEL 2

33

24%

LEVEL 3

45

32%

LEVEL 4

37

27%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

6

75%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

73
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

34

25%

LEVEL 2

28

21%

LEVEL 3

43

32%

LEVEL 4

30

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

62
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

33

27%

LEVEL 2

29

23%

LEVEL 3

37

30%

LEVEL 4

25

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

99
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

28

18%

LEVEL 2

33

21%

LEVEL 3

54

34%

LEVEL 4

45

28%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

100
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

19

11%

LEVEL 2

53

31%

LEVEL 3

56

33%

LEVEL 4

44

26%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

167
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

24

10%

LEVEL 2

51

21%

LEVEL 3

88

36%

LEVEL 4

79

33%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

158
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

20

8%

LEVEL 2

68

28%

LEVEL 3

85

35%

LEVEL 4

73

30%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

39

59%

LEVEL 2

14

21%

LEVEL 3

11

17%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

33

52%

LEVEL 2

17

27%

LEVEL 3

10

16%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

162
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

55

20%

LEVEL 2

60

22%

LEVEL 3

90

32%

LEVEL 4

72

26%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

164
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

47

17%

LEVEL 2

73

26%

LEVEL 3

90

32%

LEVEL 4

74

26%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

18
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

8

26%

LEVEL 2

5

16%

LEVEL 3

9

29%

LEVEL 4

9

29%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

6

23%

LEVEL 2

12

46%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

3

8%

LEVEL 2

8

21%

LEVEL 3

16

42%

LEVEL 4

11

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

5

13%

LEVEL 2

11

29%

LEVEL 3

11

29%

LEVEL 4

11

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

153
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

60

22%

LEVEL 2

57

21%

LEVEL 3

83

31%

LEVEL 4

70

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

150
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

48

18%

LEVEL 2

74

27%

LEVEL 3

84

31%

LEVEL 4

66

24%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

168
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

59

21%

LEVEL 2

58

20%

LEVEL 3

92

32%

LEVEL 4

76

27%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

4

17%

LEVEL 2

7

30%

LEVEL 3

7

30%

LEVEL 4

5

22%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.