Skip to Content
Main content

PS 65 ACAD OF INNOVATIVE LEARNING GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

23

12%

LEVEL 2

26

13%

LEVEL 3

90

46%

LEVEL 4

55

28%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

132
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

20

10%

LEVEL 2

47

24%

LEVEL 3

72

36%

LEVEL 4

60

30%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

77
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

8

8%

LEVEL 2

12

12%

LEVEL 3

48

49%

LEVEL 4

29

30%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

63
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

10

10%

LEVEL 2

27

27%

LEVEL 3

36

36%

LEVEL 4

27

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

15

15%

LEVEL 2

14

14%

LEVEL 3

42

43%

LEVEL 4

26

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

69
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

10

10%

LEVEL 2

20

20%

LEVEL 3

36

36%

LEVEL 4

33

33%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

13
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

3

17%

LEVEL 2

2

11%

LEVEL 3

8

44%

LEVEL 4

5

28%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

13
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

2

12%

LEVEL 2

2

12%

LEVEL 3

8

47%

LEVEL 4

5

29%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

42
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

5

10%

LEVEL 3

20

42%

LEVEL 4

22

46%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

32
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

9

22%

LEVEL 3

15

37%

LEVEL 4

17

41%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

21
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

9

23%

LEVEL 2

9

23%

LEVEL 3

15

38%

LEVEL 4

6

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

20
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

8

23%

LEVEL 2

7

20%

LEVEL 3

10

29%

LEVEL 4

10

29%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

66
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

10

12%

LEVEL 2

8

10%

LEVEL 3

46

55%

LEVEL 4

20

24%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

63
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

9

9%

LEVEL 2

28

28%

LEVEL 3

38

38%

LEVEL 4

25

25%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

15

10%

LEVEL 3

73

51%

LEVEL 4

49

34%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

115
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

22

15%

LEVEL 3

58

41%

LEVEL 4

57

40%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

23
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

16

32%

LEVEL 2

11

22%

LEVEL 3

17

34%

LEVEL 4

6

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

15

26%

LEVEL 2

25

44%

LEVEL 3

14

25%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

142
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

20

11%

LEVEL 2

25

13%

LEVEL 3

88

47%

LEVEL 4

54

29%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

131
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

19

10%

LEVEL 2

44

23%

LEVEL 3

71

37%

LEVEL 4

60

31%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

7

9%

LEVEL 2

8

10%

LEVEL 3

39

48%

LEVEL 4

27

33%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

14

18%

LEVEL 3

28

37%

LEVEL 4

31

41%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

79
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

16

14%

LEVEL 2

18

16%

LEVEL 3

51

45%

LEVEL 4

28

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

17

14%

LEVEL 2

33

27%

LEVEL 3

44

36%

LEVEL 4

29

24%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

141
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

22

12%

LEVEL 2

26

14%

LEVEL 3

87

46%

LEVEL 4

54

29%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

129
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

15

8%

LEVEL 2

42

23%

LEVEL 3

71

38%

LEVEL 4

58

31%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.