EMOLIOR ACADEMY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

35
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

153

61%

LEVEL 2

64

25%

LEVEL 3

26

10%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

68
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

163

52%

LEVEL 2

84

27%

LEVEL 3

45

14%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

14
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

69

58%

LEVEL 2

35

30%

LEVEL 3

12

10%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

29
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

78

53%

LEVEL 2

41

28%

LEVEL 3

18

12%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

21
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

84

63%

LEVEL 2

29

22%

LEVEL 3

14

10%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

39
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

85

51%

LEVEL 2

43

26%

LEVEL 3

27

16%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

6

46%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

6

75%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

6

46%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

35

56%

LEVEL 2

18

29%

LEVEL 3

7

11%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

40

55%

LEVEL 2

18

25%

LEVEL 3

12

16%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

101

63%

LEVEL 2

41

25%

LEVEL 3

14

9%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

38
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

109

53%

LEVEL 2

59

29%

LEVEL 3

23

11%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

33
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

102

53%

LEVEL 2

57

30%

LEVEL 3

24

13%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

61
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

117

48%

LEVEL 2

66

27%

LEVEL 3

38

16%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

51

85%

LEVEL 2

7

12%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

46

65%

LEVEL 2

18

25%

LEVEL 3

7

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

35
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

103

52%

LEVEL 2

59

30%

LEVEL 3

26

13%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

65
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

108

44%

LEVEL 2

73

30%

LEVEL 3

42

17%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

50

91%

LEVEL 2

5

9%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

55

80%

LEVEL 2

11

16%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

11

50%

LEVEL 2

5

23%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

16

47%

LEVEL 2

10

29%

LEVEL 3

7

21%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

142

62%

LEVEL 2

59

26%

LEVEL 3

22

10%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

147

52%

LEVEL 2

74

26%

LEVEL 3

38

14%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

32
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

124

59%

LEVEL 2

54

26%

LEVEL 3

24

11%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

57
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

139

51%

LEVEL 2

75

28%

LEVEL 3

38

14%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

29

69%

LEVEL 2

10

24%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

11
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

24

55%

LEVEL 2

9

20%

LEVEL 3

7

16%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.