ACHIEVEMENT FIRST APOLLO CHARTER GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

428
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 545

LEVEL 1

43

8%

LEVEL 2

74

14%

LEVEL 3

178

33%

LEVEL 4

250

46%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

462
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 546

LEVEL 1

25

5%

LEVEL 2

59

11%

LEVEL 3

170

31%

LEVEL 4

292

53%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

224
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

19

7%

LEVEL 2

39

14%

LEVEL 3

92

33%

LEVEL 4

132

47%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

234
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

14

5%

LEVEL 2

28

10%

LEVEL 3

81

29%

LEVEL 4

153

55%

MALE

PROFICIENT

204
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

24

9%

LEVEL 2

35

13%

LEVEL 3

86

33%

LEVEL 4

118

45%

MALE

PROFICIENT

228
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

31

11%

LEVEL 3

89

33%

LEVEL 4

139

51%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

6
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

67%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

24
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

22

88%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

35
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

7

19%

LEVEL 4

28

78%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

272
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

31

9%

LEVEL 2

50

14%

LEVEL 3

123

35%

LEVEL 4

149

42%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

276
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

22

7%

LEVEL 2

35

11%

LEVEL 3

104

31%

LEVEL 4

172

52%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

127
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

12

7%

LEVEL 2

23

14%

LEVEL 3

51

31%

LEVEL 4

76

47%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

141
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

22

13%

LEVEL 3

54

33%

LEVEL 4

87

52%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

394
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 474

LEVEL 1

21

4%

LEVEL 2

59

12%

LEVEL 3

158

33%

LEVEL 4

236

50%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

428
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 481

LEVEL 1

13

3%

LEVEL 2

40

8%

LEVEL 3

149

31%

LEVEL 4

279

58%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

34
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

22

31%

LEVEL 2

15

21%

LEVEL 3

20

28%

LEVEL 4

14

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

34
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

12

18%

LEVEL 2

19

29%

LEVEL 3

21

32%

LEVEL 4

13

20%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

411
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 520

LEVEL 1

39

8%

LEVEL 2

70

13%

LEVEL 3

169

33%

LEVEL 4

242

47%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

441
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 512

LEVEL 1

22

4%

LEVEL 2

49

10%

LEVEL 3

158

31%

LEVEL 4

283

55%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

17
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

4

16%

LEVEL 2

4

16%

LEVEL 3

9

36%

LEVEL 4

8

32%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

21
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

3

9%

LEVEL 2

10

29%

LEVEL 3

12

35%

LEVEL 4

9

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

5

7%

LEVEL 2

10

13%

LEVEL 3

29

38%

LEVEL 4

32

42%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

96
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

10

9%

LEVEL 3

31

28%

LEVEL 4

65

58%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

367
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 469

LEVEL 1

38

8%

LEVEL 2

64

14%

LEVEL 3

149

32%

LEVEL 4

218

46%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

366
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 434

LEVEL 1

19

4%

LEVEL 2

49

11%

LEVEL 3

139

32%

LEVEL 4

227

52%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

403
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 516

LEVEL 1

42

8%

LEVEL 2

71

14%

LEVEL 3

165

32%

LEVEL 4

238

46%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

25
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

3

10%

LEVEL 3

13

45%

LEVEL 4

12

41%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.